Greg from wordpress.com,

I am awaiting ownership transfer of the domain to this website!

This blog is intended as a backup and an archive for nesaranews.blogspot.com.

If the Cabals pull some crap and knock out nesaranews, nesaranetwork is the

alternate website for news and information.

 

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. 

It never did and it never will. 

Find out just what people will submit to, 

and you have found out the exact amount of 

injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; 

and these will continue until they are resisted 

with either words or blows, or with both.”

~Frederick Douglass

A MUST READ———-FROM ONE PISSED OFF JUDGE—– I HOPE I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION

Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 12:31:52 AM
Subject: Re: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact

There is a dangerous misunderstanding of the term “sovereign citizen” and I am surprised at Mr. Ferran’s ignorant misuse of it.  “Sovereign Citizen” however styled is an oxymoron, as one cannot be both a “sovereign” of any kind and at the same time a “citizen”.  His own ignorance of the Law— the actual Law as opposed to the private “law” he evidently practices—is showing.  Dave Comcast is not and has never been a “Sovereign Citizen”—- he is a peaceful inhabitant of the Continental United States claiming his birthright and objecting to the abuse of Protected Persons by the Federal United States and the numerous “governmental services corporations” being operated by international banking cartels as if they were our lawful government. 
The essence of the fraud and criminality can be reduced down to press-ganging, personage, barratry, and inland piracy being practiced by the corporate officers and employees of foreign governments acting in violation of their charters and the treaties allowing their operations on the land of the Continental United States. These are for the most part capital crimes committed by Members of the Bar Associations, the British Government, the Government of the Westminster City State, the Lord Mayor of London, the Lords of the Admiralty, ELIZABETH II, the “United States Congress” and “UNITED STATES CONGRESS” and others who are in flagrant Breach of Trust, Commercial Contract, and International Treaties establishing and separating the land and sea jurisdictions owed to the United Colonies of America. 
I suggest gentlemen that we cut the crap. 
The fraud in its entirety is know.  The criminality and the perpetrators —- are all known.  There is no escape.  There is no redemption except a thorough repentance, confession of error, and immediate action to correct.  Dr. Cordero is exactly right and Mark R. Ferran is either a dupe or a perpetrator seeking to villify the victims of crimes so as to avoid his own culpability for their mischaracterization and the identity theft and personage being routinely practiced against the peaceful inhabitants of the Continental United States. 
Both inland piracy and press-ganging have been outlawed for 200 years.  Both carry a range of penalties up to and including capital punishment.  Likewise, violation of the Geneva Convention Protocols of 1949, Volume II, Article 3 — the mischaracterization of identity or nationality of civilians — is a death penalty offense. 
Continue reading

 
This is very quickly coming to a head, gentlemen, and it is not the victims of these crimes that we need to fear.  It’s ignorance and self-service of the kind being displayed here by Mr. Ferran.  Those who are called to labor in the cause of justice must prepare themselves for a number of rude shocks, not the least of which is that many honorable men such as Dr. Cordero, have been unaware of the nature of the Bar Associations and the agenda that these organizations have pursued in America and thence throughout the world since 1845.  They are supposedly Juris Doctors who imagine that they understand the Law, but who practice law.  They can plainly read the prohibitions of the Constitutions of the United States and the united States of America against Titles of Nobility, and yet they dully imagine that they can operate as public officials and impose their private corporate “law” against the inhabitants of the Continental United States while accepting the title of “Esquire”.  They also fail to question the meaning of the word “license” as in “license to practice law” — which clearly indicates that they are involved in activities that would be criminal but for permission granted by someone, somewhere.  The “someone” was the British Monarch acting in Breach of Trust in 1845 and secretively issuing Letters of Marque and Reprisal to the Bar Associations.  Finally, they fail to notice that the “State Statutes” and the Uniform Commercial Code are both held under private copyright.  What “Public Documents” do you know of that carry a private copyright?  None.  They are all Public Domain without exception. 
Therefore, Mr. Ferran, what you (most likely) and other members of the Bar in this country have been practicing “at” not “in” is private law in Civil Maritime misapplied to innocent Americans who have trustingly and mistakenly held the members of the “legal profession” in high regard.  The other form of law met in the COURTS is “executive admiralty”— a form of “martial common law” that is not authorized by anyone but a long-dead corporate Board of Directors.  
I am attaching a list of the Dunn and Bradstreet Numbers of the “United States of America” and the “State of States” operated as franchises and a great many so-called “States” and “STATES” and government agencies which are all privately owned and operated legal fictions.  This is just one tranch— one “level” of the fraud being committed internationally against innocent American civilians so as to defraud them of their property.  The old Federal Reserve System has died a well-deserved death, but the UNITED STATES, INC., run by the IMF and chartered in France has just as many corporate franchises or more, and the new kid on the block, the newly created FEDERAL RESERVE being operated by the UNITED NATIONS Corporation under United Nations City-State auspices, has launched THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.—- all to the same purpose— to steal the identities of the individual living people and the Continental United States and to use various forms of personage and credit fraud to enslave them, press-gang them into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, and deprive them of their rights and property.  
This is being done to Americans, Canadians, Australians, English, Scots, Welsh, Irish, German, Japanese, Greek, Italian, French, Danish and most of the people of the Western World by those who have pretended to be Allies and Friends and Trustees under the most solemn kinds of National Trust Indentures, Constitutions (commercial contracts for services) and international treaties and by international banking cartels secretively operating governmental services corporations (as shown above) under conditions of gross deceit and fraud  as if these corporations were the lawful government of nations, instead of contractors providing services for pay. 
Those awful “sovereign citizens” are acting under duress and using the Uniform Commercial Code to post Financing Statement Claims in the international record— in a jurisdiction they should never have to address if the Federal United States and their Agents were doing their actual jobs. Innocent American civilians are being forced to post such claims and create such Security Agreements as a result of Bar Association predation, criminality, incompetence, and combined personage and barratry committed routinely against their persons and estates. As it stands the Bar Associations are acting as criminal syndicates on the shores of the Continental United States, are in gross violation of the Treaty allowing them to operate on the land, and in gross violation of their Charter. 
This situation isn’t going to go away by pretending that American civilians are “Paper Terrorists”.  It is appallingly apparent who the real “Paper Terrorists” are— and it is not Mom and Pop from Podunk, Mississippi.  Every Bar Association Member in America may be trembling in their shoes and wondering what they are going to do when this proverbial shit fully hits the fan, but those who “blame the victims” are only making it worse for themselves and their brethren.  The truth of the matter is already fully known, fully documented, fully recorded by courts of record including the Vatican Chancery, the British High Court, the World Court, and others since 2009.  What Dr. Cordero has documented and what he has bravely opposed is what every Bar Member needs to oppose, if they are to save their profession and their own individual skins. 
I suggest that you all examine the Laws of Admiralty and the penalties that can and eventually will be imposed upon those Members of the Bar who fail to immediately and fully seek to bring remedy to those harmed — and most especially to those “sovereign citizens” who have had sense and courage enough to bring their claims forward —even despite their pitiful lack of familiarity with international and commercial and martial law—-and thus have pushed the Truth over the edge and are now in the process of bringing this Evil and Oppressive System to a well-deserved end.  
Brave men like Doctor Cordero have always stood for what is right and opposed what is wrong, even without the goad of imminent Justice being done.  The rest of the “Mixed Class” like Mr. Ferran, however, had better consider their positon more akin to rats departing a sinking ship and hope that they can swim fast enough in the right direction to reach land ahead of the Tsunami brewing in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
For Mr. Ferran and all those Bar Association Members who are so vicously pursuing their old trade as inland pirates, insulting their victims, and imagining that their criminality will never be discovered, opposed, and punished—- the jig is up, the Public Liens are coming, the American Military will not fire on the people they are hired to protect, and the United Nations is in no position to do anything but attempt to salvage its own reputation.  It remains to be seen whether Dr. Cordero’s efforts and those of others like him will be sufficient to prevent the outlawing and liquidation of the Bar Associations worldwide and the permanent disgrace of the entire profession. 

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Mark R Ferran <mrferran@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Dr. Cordero,
I write to inform you that “Dave Comcast” ( David Lynn Coffelt) (“All rights preserved – U.C.C. – 1-308 formally 1-207″) is a member of a Cult known as “UCC/Redemption” and/or “sovereign citizens”.   The members of this/these cults have effectively abandoned and WAIVED and relinquished all civil rights they would have under the Constitution and Laws of the United States, or the several states.   They are generally considered to be “paper terrorists”, because of their typical misuse of UCC-style papers in every forum, including Traffic Court.   They bring discredit to any organization or legitimate enterprise they become associated with.  And, they have zero credibility.   They lack a competent understanding the Law, as evidenced by their misplaced esteem for the UCC as the cure for all problems.  Thus, it would be best if you declined any recognition or participation by persons like David C who advertises his membership in the Cult known as “UCC/Redemption” and/or “sovereign citizens”.
—– Original Message —–
To:
Cc: 
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact
Dr. Cordero:
Thanks for asking what I would be able to contribute to your documentary on  Re: Black Robed Predators: a proposal for a documentary on how unaccountable judges risklessly prey on your rights, property, and liberty
I would offer to you all the evidence I personally investigated and uncovered personally in my Spousal Discrimination complaint DORA filed on my behalf in Nov 2004. 
Jan 2006, DORA illegally dismissed my SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION charge by accepting unsigned evidence in default by the Isle of Capri’s Attorney Mark Barnes. DORA never did not holding my appeal hearing they already accepted; this denying me due process. 
DORA forced me into a District Court to begin with. Not only did the judge also deny due process in the courts, he was committing fraudd on the court and has done so for over 10 years as he was never a DISTRICT court judge at any time in the State of CO certified by SOS Feb 20, 2013. A FREDERICK BARKER RODGERS had his COUNTY oath sworn to in Jan 2007, forged on the back side 3.5 years later certified by the SOS on July 8, 2010 that RODGERS is a District Court Judge. 
May 7, 2012 I uncovered a “SMOKING GUN” of COUNTY COURT FREDERICK BARKER RODGERS’S COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE, WHICH WAS MAILED TO BE BY DEBORAH GEORGE, CLERK OF GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ON SEPT 10, 2010 the following day after I had submitted Rodgers County Oath certified by the SOS and demanded Rodgers to recuse himself from 2006CV32 which he sat on the bench with no judicial authority. 
When I uncovered this FRAUD I reported this fraud to every state agency out there including every NEWS INVESTIGATOR who advertise; 
Every News Investigator and Law Agency in Denver are aware of this judicial and SOS fraud committed against my wife and I; yet they all refuse to interview my wife and I and report it; likely b/c it is too big of a story and they were ordered to stand dow, or if they did report this Judicial Fraud it would likely ruin their careers, or their scared. That would be my guess.  Yet they advertise on TV everyday, “ARE YOU A WHISTLE BLOWER, WE WANT TO KNOW”…….they want to know JACK or NADDA b/c they all know the fraud I have uncovered with documented evidence provided to them all.  
Keep in mind my civil 2006CV32 in Gilpin County DISTRICT Court was held by an Imposter with no judicial authority at all who denied due process and committed fraud on the court. 
APRIL 6, 2014 – I CALLED TREASON ON A MUNICIPAL JUDGE IN LAKEWOOD COLORADO AND WITNESSED BY 3 OTHERS.
On a second issue I was in Court when I was alleged to have committed a criminal traffic offense. This was a Motion to Dismiss hearing submitted by the Prosecuting Attorney in Lakewood, CO 
This was the same day my Jury Trial I paid for was to commence. The  Prosecuting Attorney wanting to dismiss this charge I was cited for on November 19, 2014.  A rouge Cop cited me when I was the one who was sideswiped by an out of state driver. Cop accused me of causing this accident saying b/c I would have had to get in the left lane to get to work when I had just left work heading to a Dr’s appointment. I told Cop “don’t you dare put words in my mouth b/c that is just not going to happen. An hour later Cop serves me this CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, a misdemeanor. At arraignment the Judge told me I am facing a year in jail, fines, etc, wanting me to plead down to steal money from me. I paid for a Jury Trial which was never held over my objection. 
I called TREASON on the judge as again I was denied due process when I would not plead down. I paid for a Jury Trial, was denied by the Judge. I told her she is in violation of her oath of office, in violation of the U.S. Constitution she took and oath to support and then I yelled out in the Court YOU ARE COMMITTING TREASON ON RECORD. TREASON was witnessed by 3 others and is on file. I have the evidence on this also. 
If you would let me know what you would like me to supply, it is yours.
Call me when you have time.

David Lynn Coffelt
High Crimes by Federal & State Gov’t Officials – Fraud on the Court
All rights preserved – U.C.C. – 1-308 formally 1-207
Fraud, Forgery, Cover-up & Corruption under COLOR OF LAW by ACTORS of Judicial & Executive State Officials with SOS forging Judge’s County Oath of Office as a District Court Judge  All reported to & ignored by Judicial Commission, AG, DA and Denver FBI, DOJ, OIG, FBI – DC
FOR NEWS INTERVIEWS OR INVESTIGATIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTACT Mr. Coffelt directly.
Confidentiality Notice:  
This private email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information.  Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these Communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorised Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution.  With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me.  Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C.1-308.  NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. OTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS. 
“Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable…
 Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.” 
– Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Apr 19, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq. <riccordero@verizon.net> wrote:
 
Dear Mr. McCray,
There was no application to bring in cameras.
In any event, the Rules of the New York State Chief Administrative Judge, PART 131. Audio-visual Coverage Of Judicial Proceedings , http://www.nycourts.gov/rules/chiefadmin/131.shtml, only, only apply to trial courts.
The cell phones were not sequestered.
Mr. Doggart expressed interest in my proposal for the documentary Black Robed Predators(infra).
In what way could you contribute to making this documentary?
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
******************************************************
Re: Black Robed Predators: a proposal for a documentary on how unaccountable judges risklessly prey on your rights, property, and liberty
A Proposal for a documentary on
two unique cases of wrongdoing at the top of government
that expose how federal judges
have become unaccountable in connivance with the other two branches and
consequently, engage risklessly in coordinated wrongdoing
by disregarding their duty, due process, and the rule of law
to prey on We the People’s rights, property, and liberty
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
1. Federal judges’ wrongdoing has been shown through the analysis of official statistics, reports, and statements[*>ii] in the study of the Federal Judiciary whose procedural and evidentiary rules are followed by its state counterparts, for which it is the model– titled, Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing: Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(*>jur:1) The analysis highlights their means, motive, and opportunity(jur:21§§1-3) for judges’ wrongdoing.
*NOTE: See my study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts, titled:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting
or
or
or
or
or
If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, try using:
Google Chrome:
or
Mozilla-Firefox:
In the downloaded file, the blue text represents active cross-referential links that facilitate jumping to the corresponding references to check them..
If you cannot download the file through any of those links, please let Dr. Cordero  know by emailing him at Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net.
2. This article proposes its presentation in a documentary. It will emphasize its most outrageous and corruptive enabling circumstance: coordination(88§§a-c) among judges and between them and other insiders of the legal and bankruptcy systems[169], politicians(77§§5-6), and government entities(ol:19§D).
3. It will show that wrongdoing(jur:133§4) is not the deviant conduct of individual rogue judges, but rather collective conduct that is coordinated to ensure that doing wrong is safer, easier, and more beneficial. That encourages further wrongdoing.
4. So does a judge who keeps quiet about his peer’s wrongdoing, becoming accessory after the fact concerning it and before the fact concerning all future wrongdoing encouraged by the expectation of his silence. Such implicit coordination corrupts the judge and his peers, putting them ‘in the same boat’ of mutually dependent survival due to complicity: The judge is their accomplice before and after the fact and the peers are wrongdoing principals.
5. Coordination has allowed judges to develop the most harmful form of wrongdoing, i.e., schemes, such as a bankruptcy fraud scheme(jur:66§§2-3), a concealment of assets scheme[107ac, 213], and a docket clearing scheme(43§1). Coordination has made wrongdoing so widespread and routine that it is the Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized modus operandi(ol:190).

A. The documentary’ financial viability: its market is huge

6. Every year 50 million new cases are filed in the state and federal courts[4,5]. To them must be added scores of millions of pending cases. Given that every case involves at least two opposing parties, at least 100 million persons and entities go and are brought to court annually.
7. In fact, many more do so because a party can be composed of more than one person or entity; it can even be composed of a class of hundreds of thousands of persons similarly situated.
8. To the parties must be added all those persons and entities that are more or less directly affected by their litigation. These include friends, relatives, employees, buyers, suppliers, investors, creditors, debtors, shareholders, landlords, tenants, even the store on the corner, who may see its business diminished because a party and others affected by it can no longer afford to patronize its store, etc.

B. Two unique national stories to expose judges’ coordinated wrongdoing and provoke action-stirring outrage in the public during the long electoral season

9. All those persons and entities actually form the national public. The documentary can make that public aware of how it is affected by judges who abuse their power to make self-beneficial decisions that with disregard for due process of law dispose of litigants’ and non-litigants’ rights, property, liberty, and lives. Thus, it can provoke in the public action-stirring outrage(83§§2-3).
10. That is what two unique national stories(ol:55) can provoke. They can also expose top Democrat and Republican politicians[17a; jur:22¶31) who in their own interest and to the people’s detriment have allowed judges’ wrongdoing(5§3) to fester. These are the President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story –she was his first nominee to the Supreme Court– and the Federal Judiciary-NSA story.
11. A realistic plan of investigation(ol:66) based on numerous leads and reliable evidence[107a-c; jur:65§B) is available to pursue these stories through a Follow the money! investigation(ol:1) and a Follow it wirelessly! investigation(ol:19§D), respectively.
12. Such focused objective and advanced starting station facilitate the documentary’s production and reduce its cost and production lag.

C. A documentary that provides the dominant issue of the electoral season

13. The documentary can be produced in time to , and even provide the dominant issue of, the electoral season comprising the mid-term, primary, and 2016 presidential election campaigns. It can do so to a greater extent than Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, which earned over $200 million.

1. A documentary with apolitical, general public appeal

14. A documentary on judges’ wrongdoing will appeal to the national public regardless of any political affiliation or lack thereof, and independently of any or no intention to vote in any election. 

2. Insatiable public demand for information about judges’ wrongdoing

15. Rather than exhaust its subject, the documentary will open the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting. It will cause the public to demand to be informed about:
a. judges’ motive, means, and opportunity to do wrong(21§§1-3);
b. explicit and implicit coordinated wrongdoing among judges and with others(88§§a-c); and
c. the extent, nature, and gravity of judges’ past and ongoing unaccountability and wrongdoing, e.g., “demeanor, abuse of power, bias, conflict of interest, bribery, incompetence”(10,11).

3. Meeting a low standard can cause high-level resignations & impeachments

16. To be effective, the documentary only has to show that judges have violated the injunction in their own Code of Conduct “to avoid even the appearance of impropriety”[123a]. Their “appearance” of lack of respect for legal and ethical provisions in their own conduct will detract from the required trust in their having respected them enough to apply them fairly and impartially to other people’s conduct.
17. This is reasonable and precedented: Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas was forced to resign in 1969 after Life magazine made his hold on office untenable by showing that he had engaged in financial improprieties, though they did not even amount to misdemeanors(92§d).
18. Thus, the documentary can cause a flood of motions to vacate judgments and hold new trials of cases argued to, or tried before, judges who appear to have committed improprieties. This flood and the chaos into which it will throw the Federal Judiciary eventually having the same effect on the state judiciaries will work as free advertisement for the documentary.

4. Launch a Watergate-like generalized media investigation of judges

19. The above developments will prompt ever more journalists and media outlets to jump on the investigative bandwagon of judges’ wrongdoing in coordination with other parties, lest their audience go elsewhere to satisfy their demand for news thereon.
20. Thereby the documentary will launch the first-ever, Watergate-like(4¶¶10-14) generalized media investigation of the Federal Judiciary. Such ever-expanding investigation will provide a constant reminder of the documentary as its starting point and continuing point of reference.
21. The journalists’ investigation can be guided by a query that already(id.) proved to be devastating and that can be adapted as follows; and by a related query that finds its foundation in current events:
i. The President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story and the Follow the money! investigation
What did the President know
about his first Supreme Court nominee, Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor, being involved in both concealing assets –which The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico(jur:65fn107a) suspected her of doing, and which is done to commit the crimes(ol:5fn10) of tax evasion(jur:65fn107c) and money laundering– and abusing the Federal Judiciary’s and/or the NSA’s computer network –see story ii. infra–; but did the President cover it up and lie to the American public by vouching for her honesty because he wanted to ingratiate himself with those petitioning him to nominate another woman and the first Hispanic to replace Retiring Justice Souter and from whom he expected in exchange support for the passage of the Obamacare bill in Congress; and if so,
when did he know it?
ii. The Federal Judiciary-NSA story and the Follow it wirelessly! investigation
To what extent do federal judges abuse their vast computer network and expertise –which handle hundreds of millions of case files(`)– either alone or with the quid pro quo assistance of the NSA –up to 100% of whose secret requests for secret surveillance orders are rubberstamped(ol:5fn7) by the federal judges of the secret court established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)– both to conceal assets –a crime(ol:5fn10), unlike surveillance– by electronically transferring them between declared and hidden financial accounts(ol:1), and to cover up the judges’ wrongdoing by interfering with the communications –also a crime(ol:5a.fn13)– of would-be exposers and prevent them from joining forces to expose them; and if so, since when?(ol:69§C)
(See the statistical analysis supporting probable cause to believe that there has been communications interference(ol:19§Dfn2.))
22. The investigation guided by this query can generate distrust of top public officers and make improprieties –even criminal conduct[ol:7, 10]– appear that lead to their resignation or impeachment.

5. Public demand for official investigations by the authorities

23. The intensifying outrage will stir up the public to demand official investigations by Congress, DoJ-FBI, and an independent prosecutor. Their more intrusive powers to issue subpoena, search & seizure and contempt orders, indictments, to interrogate, place under oath, plea bargain, hold public hearings, etc., will allow them to make findings that will further outrage the public.

6. From an outraged public that demands reform to a civic movement

24. The stream of outrageous findings during the electoral season will stir up the public to demand that both incumbents commence and candidates pledge to undertake fundamental judicial reform(158§§6-7). This can turn judges’ wrongdoing into an issue that shapes or even dominates the campaigns because it concerns the practical meaning and safeguard of a tenet of our republic:
a. We the People, the only source of political power in ‘government of, by, and for the people’[172], are the masters who have hired public officers as servants, including judicial servants, to perform services in the People’s behalf.
   b. We are entitled to subject them to ‘reverse surveillance’(ol:29) to obtain the information needed to dispel the secrecy(27§e) of their performance in order to hold them accountable and liable to the victims of their wrongdoing(160§8).
c. A documentary intent on causing the People to assert in practice this tenet can prompt the emergence of a civic movement(164§9) that demands a new We the People-government paradigm: the People’s Sunrise.
d. By empowering the People to reestablish themselves as the masters of government, the documentary will be endowed with unequaled moral force and inspire a sense of mission: To implement the principle that ‘in government, not of men, but by the rule of law’[ol:6], Nobody is Above the Law, and ensure that judges and politicians are committed to delivering Equal Justice Under Law.

D. An outraged public can force politicians to amend the Constitution

25. The documentary can show how the three branches of government have connived to participate in, or tolerate, judges’ trampling underfoot the rule of law to squeeze out for expediency and their benefit the strictures of due process and dish out its residue: the lees of justice.
26. Nothing can outrage the national public as a showing thereof. No force can more strongly push for such convention than an outraged national public. Hence, provoking such outrage can constitute the necessary means to convince the public of the need for a constitutional convention and the content of the amendments.
27. The national public has the unique power to punish politicians who are insensitive to its mood and demands by withholding donations, volunteered work, and word of mouth support, and issuing the threat of defeat at the polls. The precedent for such popular conduct is the Tea Party, a civic movement that forces politicians to support it or risk having their careers terminated.
28. However, before a constitutional convention is convened on the strength of the 34 states that have called for it[270>Ln:309], there must be exposed how those who claim the preeminent right to interpret the Constitution, federal judges, have become unaccountable in connivance with politicians and consequently, engage risklessly in self-beneficial coordinated wrongdoing by disregarding their duty, due process, and the rule of law to prey on We the People’s rights, property, and liberty.
29. Such exposure will make it possible to determine the full extent of the constitutional amendments needed to ensure that judges perform(Lsch:10¶6) transparently and are held accountable, disciplinable, and liable to compensate their victims by We the People.(jur:158§§6-8)

E. Joining forces to produce the documentary and become Champions of Justice

30. Thus, I encourage you, the Reader, and all other advocates of honest judiciaries to join forces to produce this documentary. By exposing judges’ wrongdoing in coordination with politicians and others, it can play a key role in the coming electoral season, lead to government reform, and earn us any of many material and moral rewards(ol:3§F), such as becoming recognized by a grateful People as their Champions of Justice.
You may share and post this article widely. Meantime, I look forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger history!(jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
NOTE: Given the suspicious interference with Dr. Cordero’s email addresses described at *>ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him place the above bloc of his email addresses in the To: line of your email to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
or
*******************************

On 04/19/15, Michael McCray<mccray.michael@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Cordero,
Were you all able to get cameras or cell phones in court?
Michael McCray

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 19, 2015, at 2:57 PM, “Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq.” <riccordero@verizon.net> wrote:
 
Dear Messrs. Doggart, Jacobs, McCray, Krichevsky,  Ferran, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for attending oral argument last Thursday, April 16, or inquiring about its outcome.
A. Evidence that the appellate judges had not read the brief
Only the presiding judge had a stack of 8.5” x 11” papers that he said corresponded to the 20 appeals on the oral argument calendar for the day. The other three judges –there were only four of them– did not have any papers in front of them. Only one of the judges had a pad on which she took notes while I was arguing.
It is reasonable to assume that if the judges had read either my or the other parties’ briefs, they would have made notes on them and written questions that they wanted to ask of the parties during oral argument, and accordingly, would have brought those briefs to oral argument.
In fact, although I was the one who argue by far the longest, the judges did not ask of me any questions that they had brought with them. Instead, the questions that they asked were directly related to what I had just said.
I kept eye contact with them all the time except for the one occasion when I looked down at my outline to see the reference of a law that I was quoting. I saw them looking back at me, as opposed to being distracted looking elsewhere. It appeared as though they were paying attention to what I was saying.
B. An outline that emphasizes arguing the law, not facts or emotions
The bulletpoint-like outline(infra) that I used at oral argument highlights the many rules of statutory and case law that I argued. They are in boldface to show that I argued the law on appeal, rather than the facts or emotions, as so many pro se appellants and respondents do.
Therefore, I would like to make it available to all Advocates of Honest Judiciaries because they may find it useful in preparing their own outlines of their law-centered oral arguments.
So I encourage you to share and post this email widely.
C. Will these state judges dispose of the appeal as federal circuit judges get rid of up to 91% of appeals?
It may take months for these state appellate judges to issue their decision. They could dispose of the appeal as their counterparts in the federal circuit courts do:
Federal circuit judges get rid of 75%(* >jur:44fn66) of appeals by issuing summary orders bearing only one operative word, most frequently ‘affirmed’, since a denial would defeat its workload-dumping purpose by requiring judges to sit down to read the briefs, analyze them in light of the law, and write a decision identifying the reversible error and explaining why it is such so that it is not committed again by the lower court on remand.
or
or
or
or
or
If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, download either of the following browsers, install it, copy the first link above into the browser search box, and hit ‘Enter’. If the file, which is close to 50MB, does not download, try using the other links:
Google Chrome:
or
Mozilla-Firefox:
Moreover, federal circuit judges expediently dispose of up to an additional 16% of appeals with decisions whose reasoning is so “perfunctory”(jur:44fn68) that the judges who wrote them mark them “not for publication” and “not precedential”(jur:43§1).
These ‘decisions’ are contemptuous of a system of law based on precedent, like ours; and ashamed of public scrutiny, which explains why almost all of them avoid being linked to any judge by not being signed, but rather being issued per curiam, that is, by an impersonal “the court”.
Federal circuit judges use summary orders and unpublished, non-precedential decisions as process-abusive instruments for clearing their desktops of work and exercising arbitrary, biased, ad hoc raw judicial power(jur:44fn69).
They breach the contract for judicial adjudicative services that was formed between the judges and the parties who paid the court-required filing fee and who participated in the process because they frustrate the reasonable expectation that the controversy between the parties would be resolved, not through an autocratic, reasonless fiat, but rather by application of the rule of law based on fundamental principles of the administration and nature of justice:
“”Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.” “Justice must satisfy the appearance of justice“(jur:44fn71).
A study of each state judiciary similar to the one that I conducted of the Federal Judiciary can shed light on how state appellate judges use their judicial power. That is one of the tasks of the proposed institute for judicial unaccountability reporting and reform advocacy(jur:130§5).
I look forward to hearing from you and from those with whom you share this email.
Dare trigger history!(jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email accounts and paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
or
*******************************

On 04/16/15, Michael McCray<mccray.michael@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Cordero,
Did you have your oral arguments today… How did it go? What happened?
Michael McCray

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 14, 2015, at 10:13 AM, “Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq.” <riccordero@verizon.net> wrote:
 
Dear Mr. Valentine and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for the information that you so kindly sent me.
I would like to encourage you to participate in the mass emailing and widest posting possible of the statement on oral argument below that I will hold this coming Thursday, April 16, at 10:00 a.m., at the venue indicated below, in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact.
It is accompanied by an article on the out-of-court strategy for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform.
Time is of the essence and acting promptly would be most effective.
I thank you in advance.
Dare trigger history!(jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City

Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net, RicCordero@verizon.net, Corderoric@yahoo.com, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com

NOTE: Given the evidence at * >ggl:1 et seq. of interference with Dr. Cordero’s emails, when emailing him, please place the above bloc of his email addresses in the To: line of your email to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
or
*********************************

Re: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Next Thursday, April 16, I will present oral arguments to the Appellate Division (an appeals court) of the Second Department of the New York State (NYS) Supreme Court in Brooklyn, NY City, in a case of interest to all Advocates of Honest Judiciaries. The legal references, arguments, and structure of this statement can be used as a template by other Advocates in any state trying to hold judges accountable and even liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
Table of Contents
A. The issues under review affect the ever growing number of pro ses and involve the liability of judges for causing injury in fact to any party
B. The facts show that the judge failed to ‘hear’ the party’s oral and written arguments; and disregarded or ignored the law and the facts
C. The Appellate court should hold that the judge was tortiously irresponsible, discriminatory, and incompetent, and acted in breach of contract
D. Relief through which the Appellate court can set judicial accountability reform in motion for New York and the rest of the country
E. Your attendance in support of the principle that We the People are the masters and can hold liable judicial public servants
*****************************
A. The issues under review affect the ever growing number of pro ses and involve the liability of judges for causing injury in fact to any party
1. Whether a NYS Supreme Court justice –a trial judge– is liable to compensate plaintiff for:
a. disregarding his duty to uphold a party’s due process right under the U.S. (5th and 14th Amendments) and NY (§6) Constitutions to be heard by refusing to hear him at a hearing and deciding his case without reading his brief, whereby he also disregarded his duty under the NY Code of Judicial Conduct, Section 100.3(B)(6) to “accord every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding…the right to be heard according to law”;
b. disregarding his duty under the U.S. (14th Amdt.) and NY (§11) Constitutions to afford equal protection under the law by showing a dismissive attitude toward a party upon finding out that he was pro se and treating him discriminatorily by assuming that he did not know what he was doing; whereby he also disregarded his duty under the Code, Section 100.3(B)(4) to “not, by words or conduct, manifest bias or prejudice”;
c. disregarding his duty under the Code, Section 100.3(B)(1) to “be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it” by grossly misstating the law;
d. disregarding his duty under §102 of the Civil Procedure Law and Rules CPLR, the NYS code of civil procedure– to apply those rules so that they are “not inconsistent with the constitution, [or] act of the legislature. No rule…shall abridge or enlarge the substantive rights of any party”, when the judge turned the use of a form to prove service of the summons and complaint on the defendants into a requirement that abridged plaintiff’s right to access to the court to have his controversy with defendants adjudicated although plaintiff had met the constitutional due process requirement of giving notice to the defendants of the claims pending against them and opportunity to be heard in their defense; and
e. disregarding his duty under CPLR §104 to apply the rules liberally” by limiting service to only one of the 14 CPLR service provisions and excluding from consideration another of those provisions under which plaintiff’s affidavit of service proved service, which has forced plaintiff to engage in extensive legal research and writing, pay court fees and printing and service costs, and bear the consequences of the defendants’ wrongdoing for more than two additional years, whereby the judge also denied him the intended benefit of §104 “to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every civil judicial proceeding” –a provision patterned after Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which Rules have been adopted by many states–.
2. This case is particularly appropriate to test these issues because the defendants failed to file an answer or appear in court, so it was the judge who gave rise to those issues by his wrong and wrongful handling of the case.
3. The case must be decided by the Appellate court, rather than a judicial performance commission, because only the former has administrative and adjudicative duties that empower it to award damages or remand to a trial court with instruction either to hold a judge liable, or determine his liability, to compensate a party injured by a judge’s wrongdoing.
B. The facts show that the judge failed to ‘hear’ the party’s oral and written arguments; and disregarded or ignored the law and the facts
4. In accordance with procedural rules, the summons and complaint were served by mail on the defendants, who brought them to an attorney. He wrote a letter to plaintiff identifying himself as their attorney in the case, discussing substantive issues of the complaint, insinuating a counterclaim and a transfer to another jurisdiction, and proposing mediation. But they failed to file an answer. Hence, the defendants defaulted.
5. Plaintiff raised a motion for default judgment as well as declaratory judgment, i.e., for the court to state its adoption of plaintiff’s requested positions on related issues. The defendants failed to answer it too.
6. On the hearing day, there were dozens of motions on the calendar. After the clerk called plaintiff’s motion, she asked where the service form was. Plaintiff replied that it had not been used because service had been made by mail. She said that the judge would have to deal with that, walked up to him, and gave him the motion as she told him something.
7. When plaintiff approached the bench, the judge asked whether he was a pro se party and he answered that he was. The judge asked where the affidavit of service of the summons and complaint was. Plaintiff started to state that he had served them by mail and that the defendants had had their attorney send plaintiff a letter stating that he was their legal representative in…the judge blurted “I don’t want to hear about it! You have to file an affidavit under 308”.
8. Plaintiff responded that he had performed service under CPLR §312-a, which allows a plaintiff to perform service and file an affidavit as proof thereof, and that such proof was in his motion for default and declaratory judgment. The judge stated, “I will take a look at it”. He thus ended the hearing, which lasted less than two minutes.
9. Thereupon, the judge scribbled on a court form a denial of the default motion for “failure to submit proof of service of the summons and complaint“. Most likely he did so while he was still on the bench and without time to read the motion before the next movant approached him. So he failed to notice that proof of service had been listed as the first item of the Table of Contents on the first page of the motion and constituted its third page, but it was what CPLR §312-a referred to “As an alternative to the methods of personal service authorized by section…308”.
10. In his rush to clear his docket of a pro se case, he mailed a copy of the form to plaintiff that same day although his decision was not recorded by the clerk until a month later. One can hardly imagine that if the parties to this case had been NY Retails Association v. Pacific Coast Docks, each represented by top lawyers, the judge would have proceeded with such dismissiveness and haste He did not even mention the declaratory judgment branch of the motion.
11. When plaintiff moved to reargue the motion, the judge denied him oral argument. He took five months to deny the reargue motion, but did not send any copy to plaintiff, who after numerous calls had to go to the courthouse, look for the decision, and have it recorded by the clerk. The judge alleged again that a required form to prove service had not been used. He failed again to even mention the request for declaratory judgment.
C. The Appellate court should hold that the judge was tortiously irresponsible, discriminatory, and incompetent, and acted in breach of contract
12. The judge was irresponsible by deciding a motion that he had not read, did not have time to read, and did not want to know anything about because he had prejudged the issue and had closed his mind to what a pro se had to say about it. By discriminating against plaintiff as a pro se and being partial to his own views, the judge denied him his due process right to a fair and impartial tribunal.
13. The judge disposed of plaintiff’s contentions by resorting to the lazy and conclusory statement that they “are without merit”. He pretended to provide support for it by perfunctorily quoting defendants’ attorney: “Nobody here considers himself or herself served”. With that, the judge grossly misstated the law by implying that being served is a subjective state of the defendant rather than the legal consequence of the objective fact of service in any manner provided for by law: Service can be effected by affixing the summons to a door of defendant’s home or even by publication in a newspaper!
14. The judge added that the required form of CPLR §312-a had not been used, while failing to notice that CPLR §306(e) provides that “A writing admitting service…is adequate proof of service”.
15. If the judge denied the motion out of ignorance of the law, he proceeded incompetently. If he did it out of expediency to avoid reversing himself, which would have implied his admission that he had erred in denying the motion, he proceeded dishonestly.
16. In either case, the judge breached the contract to render the judicial service of determining a controversy according to law and honestly contracted for upon his employer, the court, accepting the fees charged to, and paid by, the plaintiff.
D. Relief through which the Appellate court can set judicial accountability reform in motion for NY and the rest of the country
17. I will stress to the Appellate court and its judges that to protect the constitutional and statutory rights of not only plaintiff, but also all other parties who are or will come before the judge, and to discharge their duty under the Code of Conduct, Section 100.1, “to uphold the integrity of the judiciary and its independence…from undue influence of relationships” to their peers, and under Section 100.3, to “perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently”, whether they be their “adjudicative, administrative, or disciplinary duties”, they must hold the judge accountable for his wrong and wrongful handling of this case and liable to compensate plaintiff for the injury in fact that he has caused him, just as they would hold any other public officer or private citizen.
18. To that end, I will ask that the Appellate court:
a. on behalf of plaintiff, reverse the denial of the default and declaratory motion and grant it; order the refund of all court fees paid by him; compensate him for his legal work; award other damages; and grant the requested declaratory judgment; an
b. on behalf of other parties and the rest of the public:
1) order the auditing of the judge’s decisions and hold hearings of parties and attorneys that have come before him, court clerks, and his peers, to detect a pattern of conduct and determine his suitability for judicial office in terms of his record, competence, and character; thereby
2) take action that sets in motion in the courts of New York and all other jurisdictions a development that does for the benefit of the American justice system what the Supreme Court did for the benefit of our national education system in Brown v. Board of Education when it recognized a similar principle: Holding judges separate from all other people as a class immune from accountability and liability is an inherent violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the federal and state Constitutions; and
3) if this Appellate court cannot grant the above-requested relief, let it certify a question to the Court of Appeals –the highest court in the NYS judiciary- asking whether the recognition of such principle, from which the rest flows as implementing measures, is mandated by the federal and state Constitutions.
E. Your attendance in support of the principle that We the People are the masters and can hold liable judicial public servants
19. I encourage you and all Advocates to attend oral argument and invite journalists to cover it to impress upon the Appellate court the importance of this case as a test of the value that it puts on two tenets of our democracy:
a. In ‘government of, by, and for the people, We the People are the masters of all public servants, including judicial public servants, and are entitled to hold them accountable, disciplinable, and liable to compensate the victims of their misconduct.
b. Judges too are subject to the foundational principle that in ‘government, not of men and women, but by the rule of law’, Nobody Is Above the Law so that there must be administered to, and imposed on, all Equal Justice Under Law.
20. The Appellate court is located at 45 Monroe Place in Brooklyn, NY City, very near the Court Street and Borough Hall subway stations on the 2, 3, 4, 5, and R Lines. The case will be heard when called after 10:00 a.m. For every useful purpose, this Appellate Division’s website is at http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/contactus.shtml; and its phone number is (718) 722-6324.
I look forward to receiving your comments. You may also share your comments with the court at AD2-ClerksOffice@nycourts.gov; see also http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/contactus.shtml.
Meantime, kindly acknowledge receipt of this email.
You may widely share and post this email as well as the related article below.
Dare trigger history!(* >jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
NOTE: Given the evidence at * >ggl:1 et seq. of interference with Dr. Cordero’s emails, when emailing him, please place the above bloc of his email addresses in the To: line of your email to enhance the chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
See also Dr. Cordero’s study of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, the models for their state counterparts, titled:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting
or
or
or
or
or
If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, try using:
Google Chrome:
or
Mozilla-Firefox:
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
or
*******************************
Re: Out-of-court strategy for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform
The out-of-court strategy
for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform
that appeals to journalists’ self-interest to inform
the national public of two unique national stories so that
outraged, it forces politicians campaigning in these elections
to officially investigate judges and reform the Federal Judiciary
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
A. The out-of-court strategy for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform
1. The purpose of advocates of honest judiciaries for joining forces is to pursue judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform. They can do so by implementing:
a. an out-of-court strategy to inform the national public(* >ol:139§1)
b. through the further(ol:194§E) investigation by journalists(ol:111) and students(ol:113§C) of the two unique national stories of President Obama-Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA(ol:191§§A,B) involving objective, criminal wrongdoing rather than discretionary decision-making on any legal issues; and
c. so to outrage the public that it demands more updating news,
d. thus giving ever more journalists a commercial interest(ol:199§2) in offering such news by ‘digging deeper’ into
1) the enabling circumstances of wrongdoing(ol:191¶6) in the Federal Judiciary; and
2) the coordination to do wrong(jur:88§§a-c) among judges(* >jur:102§a) and between them and other legal and bankruptcy systems insiders (jur:81fn169) to the point where
e. the journalistic findings so exacerbate the outrage of the national public that the latter forces(ol:123¶17)
f. campaigning and incumbent politicians to officially investigate federal judges at nationally televised hearings and
g. undertake judicial unaccountability and discipline reform(ol:201§K).
* Note: All (blue text references) are keyed to the study of institutionalized wrongdoing in the Federal Judiciary and its coordination among its judges, the models for their state counterparts, titled:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(* >jur:1)
The study and this article are contained in a pdf file that can be downloaded through these links:
or
or
or
or
or
If these links do not download the file in Internet Explorer, try using:
Google Chrome:
or
Mozilla-Firefox:
1. The superiority over filing complaints or suits against judges in court
2. This out-of-court strategy:
a. recognizes and avoids the failed, rote reflex of suing judges in court(ol:158) in the counter-intuitive expectation that judges will allow their peers, who are their colleagues and friends, to be found liable;
b. appeals to journalists and highlights their interest in advancing their careers by making a scoop regarding an issue that becomes a dominant one of the primaries and the presidential campaign because it:
1) exposes the criminal wrongdoing underlying the suspicion by The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico(jur:65fn107a) of concealment of assets by Then-Judge, Now-Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, the first justiceship nominee of President Obama –concealment of assets is committed to evade taxes; launder money with dirty origin, e.g., from a bankruptcy fraud scheme run by federal judges(jur:65§§1-3); and escape marital property and bankruptcy estate distribution; so it is a criminal act(ol:5fn10)–;
2) strengthens the available evidence that the NSA abuses its authority by doing ‘whatever it can do technically without regard to whether it should not do it because it is unlawful or unethical’(ol:76¶3); and
3) provokes a scandal with more intense outrage and reformative consequences than the one that burst out of Snowden’s revelations because it shows that the Federal Judiciary and its judges abuse their authority, not in ‘the national security interest’, but rather in their crass personal interest in money(jur:27§2; 65§§1-2), expediency(jur:44fn69), and a cover-up(68§3) of the wrongful status that they have arrogated to themselves as the safe haven for wrongdoing by Judges Above the Law.
B. Politicians forced to condemn and investigate judges’ wrongdoing
3. No politician can afford to refuse to condemn criminal wrongdoing, such as concealment of assets, even if committed by a judge, not even by a justice of the Supreme Court.
4. Democratic politicians will not dare allege that so-called liberal media, said to lean toward their party, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico, had a bias against President Obama and his first justiceship nominee, Then-Judge Sotomayor.
5. Far from it, every insightful journalist will ask whether there was a quid pro quo between those media outlets and the Obama administration providing for the former to kill their story in exchange for some benefits from the latter(jur:xlviii).
6. Those who are willing to think strategically will recognize this “Al Capone tactic”: to ‘get’ federal judges on tax evasion through an out-of-court journalistic investigation that opens the door to further investigation into their coordinated wrongdoing by them.
7. This out-of-court strategy is pragmatic and brings to bear on its implementation journalists’ self-interest and thus, their collectively massive investigative and information dissemination resources. Therefore, it is superior to relying on yet another historically futile attempt by an individual party, such as a tax complainant, working in isolation with his comparatively puny amount of effort, money, and legal research to show in court that a judge was ‘corrupt’ because she issued a ruling or a decision in the exercise of her discretion that led to the party’s loss, such as of his bid for lower taxes or no taxes at all.
C. Some journalists’ investigation of a justice becomes a Watergate-like generalized, competition-driven, and first-ever media and Trojan horse investigation of wrongdoing in the Federal Judiciary
8. The further(ol:194§E) out-of-court investigation of Justice Sotomayor’s wrongdoing may initially be conducted by citizen journalists, journalism students, and rooky journalists, whose likely profile(jur:xlvi§§H-I) may be very different from that of established journalists. Nevertheless, all of them need provide only enough information to show that she failed to abide by Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges to “avoid even the appearance of impropriety”(jur:68fn123a) because she appears:
a. to be a tax cheat(ol:194§1);
b. to have withheld from the Senate Committee on Judicial Nominations a case that would have exposed her cover-up of a bankruptcy judge appointed(jur:43fn61a) by her peers and running a bankruptcy fraud scheme(ol:194§2); and
c. to be partial to her complained-about peers by exonerating them in 100% of cases(ol:195§3) while being indifferent to the rights and plight of the complaining victims and future potential victims.
9. The scandal provoked by the initial journalists’ exposure of Justice Sotomayor’s wrongdoing will have the normal consequences of every scandal: A generalized jump by journalists and media outlets onto the investigative bandwagon because none can afford on competitive grounds not to carry updating news on the scandal or not to search for, and be credited with, the next scoop, lest they be reduced to mere redistributors of what others already discovered and published or to observers of other journalists who make a name for their findings or insightful articles.
1. Investigating the circumstances enabling J. Sotomayor’s wrongdoing
10. Thus, journalists will expand their investigation of Justice Sotomayor’s wrongdoing into a Trojan horse one of the context in which she committed it, that is, the Federal Judiciary, pursuing, among others these investigative queries:
a. Why was J. Sotomayor not caught when she submitted to her peers(jur:105fn213) for review her mandatory annual financial disclosure reports(jur:65fn107d)?
b. In what similar or other(jur:102§a) wrongdoing do Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor and her peers(jur:71§4) have engaged and on the assurance that none of them will dare denounce them, for if they did, they would risk having the investigation started by them end up incriminating them for their own wrongdoing as principals or for having covered up as accessories before and after the fact that of others(jur:88§§a-c)?
c. What did President Obama, Sen. Schumer and Gillibrand –the two senators who were the main shepherds of J. Sotomayor through the Senate confirmation process–, and their colleagues know about her wrongdoing and when did they know it?
11. That is how the initial investigation of the two unique national stories of President Obama-J. Sotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA(ol:191§§A,B) can give rise to a Watergate-like(jur:4¶¶10-14) generalized and first-ever media investigation of the Federal Judiciary and its judges in connivance with politicians(ol:200§I). Its findings can keep exacerbating the outrage of the national public precisely when the primaries and the presidential election campaign are in full swing.
12. If Justice Sotomayor is shown to give “even the appearance of impropriety” by, among other wrongdoing, concealing assets to evade taxes, her moral authority to require others to comply with tax laws and IRS rules and regulations would be shattered, as it would concerning all other laws. The call for her resignation would follow. The precedent here is the resignation of Justice Abe Fortas on May 14, 1969, after Life magazine revealed his financial improprieties, which were not even misdemeanors(jur:92§d).
2. The national outrage in an electoral context at judges’ wrongdoing will establish the need for substantial judicial reform
13. By advocates of honest judiciaries embracing the out-of-court strategy for judicial wrongdoing exposure and reform and implementing it through self-interested journalists they will accomplish what in-court complainants of judges’ allegedly wrong or wrongful decisions cannot possibly accomplish:
14. The investigation will expose not merely one wrongdoing justice, but rather the Federal Judiciary as a wrongdoing institution run by judges held unaccountable(ol:191¶¶1-7) by themselves(jur:21§1) and by conniving politicians(jur:22¶31) so that the judges risklessly do wrong in pursuit of their own interest, doing so in such a routine, widespread, and coordinated fashion that wrongdoing has become intrinsic to their performance: It is the Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized modus operandi(jur:49§4).
15. The deeper and more extensive and outrageous the wrongdoing exposed, the more convincing the need for substantial judicial reforms(ol:201§J), including those that today would appear unthinkable. That explains why this is not the time for a detailed public debate of whether and, if so, how to reform the Federal Judiciary or its state counterparts.
D. Strategic opportunity to turn the fight for the Democratic leadership in the Senate into an incentive to expose judicial wrongdoing
16. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid has announced that he will not run for reelection and would like to see New York Senator Chuck Schumer succeed him. His wish will be opposed by all the senators and other people who do not want Sen. Schumer as minority leader or who want that office for themselves or their friends.
17. The most effective way for Sen. Schumer’s opponent within his own party to derail his ascension to that leadership position is for them to establish, whether openly or covertly, ‘his appearance of impropriety’(cf., jur:68fn123a), to wit:
18. Sen. Schumer knew, or willfully ignored the evidence(id. >jur:65fn107c; 78fn159e), that Then-Judge Sotomayor had concealed assets; and went on to vouch for her honesty as the main shepherd through her confirmation process in the Senate. He did so to advance his interest in strengthening his personal relation with President Obama. The latter, in turn, wanted to ingratiate himself with all those who were petitioning him to nominate another woman and the first Hispanic as replacement for Retiring Justice Souter and from whom both the President and Sen. Schumer expected in return support for the passage of Obamacare, which at the time, spring of 2009, was very much in doubt.
19. Sen. Schumer would be placed in a very embarrassing position if he were asked by journalists and the public to release unredacted all the FBI vetting reports –there are at least three of them(jur:102¶231a.4-6)– on J. Sotomayor held by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, on which he sat at the time and still sits.
20. More importantly, the investigation prompted by his opponents will likewise become a Trojan horse into the circumstances enabling wrongdoing in the Federal Judiciary through the connivance of judges and politicians(jur:71§§4-6).
E. Request of action on your part
21. Therefore, I respectfully request that we join forces and that you, thinking strategically:
a. reach out to all advocates of honest judiciaries to bring their skills, resources, and commitment to bear on the implementation of the out-of-court strategy(ol:193§D) to expose judges’ wrongdoing and set in motion the process of judicial reform; to that end,
b. email and post this email widely , and organize presentations(ol:194§G; ol:225§D) in private, at press conferences, and elsewhere(ol:198§a), whether in person or by video conference, to persuade(ol:199§H) journalists and other professionals(jur:128§a) and students(jur:129§b); Democratic senators opposing the Reid-Schumer leadership; and Republicans seeking to discredit Democrats; to further(ol:194§E) investigate the two unique national stories of P. Obama-J. Sotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA(ol:191§§A,B);
c. resort to all other means, i.e., social media and mass emailing, to launch a Watergate-like generalized media investigation(ol:200§I) that informs the national public of judges’ individual and coordinated wrongdoing so that an outraged public may force campaigning politicians and their supporting incumbents to take a stand on the issue and officially investigate it at nationally televised hearings, thus turning judges’ wrongdoing into a dominant issue of the election campaign that leads to judicial reform(ol:201¶50); in that vein,
d. use your access to bloggers, news redistributors, talkshow hosts, and other members of the media to build the Coalition for Justice(ol:222§1), which can become a powerhouse in national politics and help develop a Tea Party-like civic movement: the People’s Sunrise(ol:201§J); and
e. encourage Information Technology experts, such as your son-in-law and his fellow computer security experts, to determine in their own professional interest of making a name for themselves whether there has been interception(ol:227§A) by the Federal Judiciary, NSA(ol:192§B) or any other parties(ggl:1 et seq.) of the communications of advocates, including me, to prevent us from joining forces to expose the wrongdoing of federal judges in connivance with politicians, which constitutes a denial of our constitutional rights under the First Amendment to “freedom of speech[,] of the press[, and] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”(jur:130fn268).
22. By joining other advocates, and thinking and proceeding strategically to help the national public assert its right to be masters of all public servants, including judicial ones, and hold them account-able for rendering honest services, you and they can be recognized by a grateful nation as We the People’s Champions of Justice(ol:201§K).
I look forward to hearing from you. Meantime, kindly acknowledge receipt of this email.
I encourage you to share and post this email widely.
Dare trigger history!(jur:7§5)…and you may enter it!
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
NOTE: Given the suspicious interference with Dr. Cordero’s email addresses described at *>ggl:1 et seq., when emailing him place the above bloc of his email addresses in the To: line of your email to enhance the chances of its reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, Med, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
or
***********************************

On 04/14/15, Joel R. Valentine<JRValentine@laneconstruct.com> wrote:

Dear Richard,
First would you please so kind as to change our point of contact, please forward all mail to my personal not business email address which joelrvalentine@gmail.com and remove jrvalentine@laneconstruct.com from your mailing list.
Also, I would like for you to look at this receive ruling in PA, it may help.
Best,
Joel Valentine
From: Dr.Richard Cordero, Esq. [mailto:riccordero@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:04 PM
To: marcia.rock@nyu.edu; Stephen.Engelberg@propublica.org; unpac@unitedrepublic.org; whistleblowers@startribune.com; ssugarmd@msn.com; CorderoRic@yahoo.com; Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@outlook.com; Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab.net
Subject: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact

 

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Next Thursday, April 16, I will present oral arguments to the Appellate Division (an appeals court) of the Second Department of the New York State (NYS) Supreme Court in Brooklyn, NY City, in a case of interest to all Advocates of Honest Judiciaries. The legal references, arguments, and structure of this statement can be used as a template by other Advocates in any state trying to hold judges accountable and even liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
Table of Contents
A. The issues under review affect the ever growing number of pro ses and involve the liability of judges for causing injury in fact to any party
B. The facts show that the judge failed to ‘hear’ the party’s oral and written arguments; and disregarded or ignored the law and the facts
C. The Appellate court should hold that the judge was tortiously irresponsible, discriminatory, and incompetent, and acted in breach of contract
D. Relief through which the Appellate court can set judicial accountability reform in motion for New York an
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
 ___________ Attachment _______________
DUNS Numbers of the US Corporate Government and Most of Its Major Agencies
United States Government-052714196
US Department of Defense (DOD)-030421397
US Department of the Treasury-026661067
US Department of Justice (DOJ)-011669674
US Department of State-026276622
US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)-Office of the Secretary-112463521
US Department of Education-944419592
US Department of Energy-932010320
US Department of Homeland Security-932394187
US Department of the Interior-020949010
US Department of Labor-029536183
US Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)-Office of the Secretary-030945779
US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-931691211
US Transportation Security Administration (TSA)-050297655
US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-056622429
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection (CBP)-796730922
Federal Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)-130221646
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-057944910
National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)-003259074
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-079933920
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-364281923
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-037751583
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-020309969
US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)-003475175
US Public Health Service (USPHS)-039294216
National Institutes of Health (NIH)-061232000
US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)-927645465
US Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-138182175
US Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-040539587
Federal Reserve Board of Governors (Fed)-001959410
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-878865674
National Security Agency (NSA)-617395215
US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)-167247027
Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms & Tobacco (BAFT)-132282310
Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-926038563
Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)-926038407
DUNS Numbers of Each US Corporate State and Its Largest City
State of Alabama-004027553                  City of Birmingham-074239450
State of Alaska-078198983                     City of Fairbanks-079261830
State of Arizona-068300170                    City of Phoenix-030002236
State of Arkansas-619312569                 City of Little Rock-065303794
State of California-071549000                 City of Los Angeles-159166271
State of Colorado-076438621                  City of Denver-066985480
State of Connecticut-016167285              City of Bridgeport-156280596
State of Delaware-037802962                  City of Wilmington-067393900
District of Columbia-949056860               City of Washington-073010550
State of Florida-004078374                     City of Miami-965299576
State of Georgia-069230183                    City of Atlanta-065372500
State of Hawaii-077676997                      City of Honolulu-828979612
State of Idaho-071875734                       City of Boise-070017017
State of Illinois-065232498                      City of Chicago-556057206
State of Indiana-071789435                     City of Indianapolis-964647155
State of Iowa-828089701                         City of Davenport-963855494
State of Kansas-827975009                    City of Wichita-069862755
State of Kentucky-828008883                 City of Louisville-943445093
State of Louisiana-0612389911                City of New Orleans-033692404
State of Maine-061207536                      City of Portland, Maine-071747802
State of Maryland-847612442                  City of Baltimore-052340973
State of Massachussetts-138090548       City of Boston-007277284
State of Michigan-054698428                  City of Detroit-021733631
State of Minnesota-050375465                City of Minneapolis-009901959
State of Mississippi-008210692               City of Jackson-020864955
State of Missouri-616963596                   City of Kansas (City)-832496868
State of Montana-945782027                   City of Billings-068925759
State of Nebraska-041472307                 City of Omaha-926604690
State of Nevada-123259447                     City of Las Vegas-019342317
State of New Hampshire-066760232        City of Manchester-045009073
State of New Jersey-067373258              City of Newark-019092531
State of New Mexico-007111818             City of Albuquerque-129962346
State of New York-041002973                 City of New York-021741036
State of North Carolina-830979667           City of Charlotte-809275006
State of North Dakota-098564300            City of Bismarck-080245640
State of Ohio-034309166                        City of Columbus-010611869
State of Oklahoma-050411726                City of Oklahoma (City)-073131542
State of Oregon-932534998                     City of Portland (Oregon)-054971197
State of Pennsylvania-933882784            City of Philadelphia-929068737
State of Rhode Island-008421763            City of Providence-069853752
State of South Carolina-067006072          City of Columbia-878281562
State of Tennessee-04143882                 City of Memphis-051386258
State of Texas-002537595                      City of Houston-967421590
State of Utah-009094301                        City of Salt Lake City-017096780
State of Vermont-066760240                   City of Burlington-037442977
State of Virginia-047850373                    City of Virginia Beach-074736299
State of Washington-079248936              City of Seattle-009483561
State of West Virginia-828092515            City of Charleston (West Virginia)-197931681
State of Wisconsin-001778349                City of Milwaukee-004779133
State of Wyoming-832826015                 City of Cheyenne-021917273
DUNS Numbers of the United Nations Corporation and Some of Its Major Corporate Agencies
United Nations (UN)-824777304
UN Development Program (UNDP)-793511262
UN Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization (UNESCO)-053317819
UN World Food Program (UNWFP)-054023952
UN International Children’s Education Fund (UNICEF)-017698452
UN World Health Organization (WHO)-618736326ro
 

Are you on the Jade Helm “extraction” list? Critical Advisory

TO ALL WRAM MEMBERS:
FROM: FIREHAWK, Director of WRAM
Jade Helm Has Started and You Must Get Ready to Fight!
We know what’s coming; now it’s time to prepare for the fight of our lives and the lives of our children! Do you know what to do when militarized police or U.N. troops start coming down your street to “extract” outspoken dissidents, patriot leaders, and militia members? Are you on the Red List? Do you know where the nearest detention center is? Discover the shocking truth on this edition of Fire hawk’s American Firestorm.
Join Firehawk and two very special guests as they reveal not only what’s happening now and what’s coming in the right around the corner with JADE HELM; but what you need to do immediately and how you can help stop the armed assault on America by foreign mercenaries! Sound impossible? Don’t bet your life and liberty on it!
PLUS! WE NEED YOUR HEKP NOW! Find out what you can do to assist America’s Freedom Fighters. We’ll spell it all out in this episode!
Join Firehawk and guests for this episode of Firehawk’s American Firestorm on Blog Talk Radio; live every Wednesday at 9:00 PM ET.
Brought to you by Well Regulated American Militias at WWW.WRAMsite.com .

Visit WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS at: http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

 

ROMAN SOCIETY OF 300 SAVED ROME IN ANCIENT HISTORY, FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA – APRIL 22, 2015 – 4:07 PM

THIS OLD ROMAN LEGEND BELOW SHOWS HOW ONE BRAVE YOUNG MAN CAN DEFEAT AN ARMY OUT TO CONQUER HIS COUNTRY. FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA. APRIL 22, 2015

Inline image 1   Inline image 2   Image result for ROME SAVED BY ROMAN YOUTH MUCIUS

     ANY TIME THAT AMERICA IS THREATENED BY MILITARY OCCUPATION BY A BIG ARMY, THIS TACTIC USED IN MODERN TIMES MIGHT WELL DEFEAT AN ARMY BY THIS TACTIC WHICH WORKED BEFORE IN MILITARY HISTORY! ONE ROMAN YOUTH BY THE NAME OF MUCIUS BROKE THE NERVE OF THE ETRUSCAN GENERAL POSENA WHO SUED FOR PEACE AND WITHDREW HIS ARMY FROM ROME AFTER MUCIUS USED THIS TACTIC ON HIM. 

      MODERNIZING THIS TACTIC FOR OUR AGE, YOU KNOW WHO THE LEADER OR LEADERS ARE OF THE ARMY SENT AGAINST YOU INCLUDING THEIR NATIONAL LEADER. YOU TARGET THEM AND HOW TO KILL THEM. YOU HAVE MODERN TACTICS TO DELIVER LETHAL WEAPONS AGAINST THEM SUCH AS GUIDED DRONES CARRYING HIGH EXPLOSIVES, POISON TO DROP INTO THEIR WATER OR FOOD. GASOLINE TO BURN UP THEIR HEADQUARTERS OR MILITARY CAMP AND USE YOUR IMAGINATION FOR OTHER ANGLES HOW TO GET RID OF THE LEADERSHIP OF THE OTHER SIDE. YOU ALSO COULD USE EVEN CROSSBOWS OR OTHER WAYS TO DELIVER AIMED BOMBS,ETC. AGAINST THEIR LEADER OR LEADERS, AND FOR THE LOCAL COMMANDER OR GENERAL AND HIS CLOSE OFFICERS WITH HIM OF THE ARMY COME TO DEFEAT YOUR SIDE AND CAPTURE YOUR PEOPLE, FIGURE HOW TO KILL THEM OFF BY CLEVER ATTACK ANGLES. IF YOU GET CAUGHT, YOU LIKE ANCIENT MUCIUS TELL THEM OF YOUR VOLUNTEER GROUP OF 300 OR SO ALL SWORN TO KILL THEM BY CLEVER, DIRTY TRICK METHODS THAT SHOULD WORK IN KILLING THEM OFF, SO IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THEY KILL YOU OR NOT. YOUR SIDE WILL KILL OFF AND WIPE OUT THEIR COMMANDERS REGARDLESS. YOU COULD SEND THEM POISONOUS INSECTS, SNAKES, ETC. AND OTHER NICE THINGS TO PUT THEM INTO A PERPETUAL SLEEP FOREVER ONCE THEY GO TO BED OR WHEREVER ELSE THEY ARE VULNERABLE. 

     IT IS CONVENTIONAL MILITARY DOCTRINE THAT A GOOD COMMANDO OR GUERRILLA FIGHTER CAN EASILY BE WORTH 10 REGULAR SOLDIERS IN THE FIELD AND USED CORRECTLY, THIS UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY FIGHTER CAN EVEN PIN DOWN COUNTLESS NUMBERS OF SOLDIERS BY HIS UNCONVENTIONAL WAY OF FIGHTING CONVENTIONAL SOLDIERS. 

     RUMORS ARE FLYING OF MAYBE A “RED DAWN” ATTACK ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY FOREIGN SOLDIERS, ETC. IN ORDER TO CONQUER AMERICA FOR FOREIGN POWERS. HOWEVER, ONCE YOU USE YOUR BRAINS AND COMMON SENSE, YOU ARE A DANGEROUS FORCE TO ANY MERCENARY AND FOREIGN SOLDIERS TRYING TO CONQUER YOU AND THEN KILL YOU OFF IN THEIR VERSION OF A CONCENTRATION CAMP OR BEFORE. AS MY MOTHER USED TO COMMENT, IF THE JEWS HAD MET THE NAZI GESTAPO OR SS WITH GUNS BLAZING WHEN THEY CAME TO TRY AND ROUND UP THE JEWS FOR CONCENTRATION CAMPS TO BE KILLED THERE, PRETTY SOON THE GESTAPO, ETC. MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN SO BRAVE ANYMORE AND MAYBE MANY MORE JEWS MIGHT HAVE SURVIVED WORLD WAR II THAN ACTUALLY DID! THE OLD TESTAMENT TAUGHT THAT THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL HAD THE GOD-GIVEN RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST AN ENEMY POWER, ARMY, ETC. JESUS CHRIST SHOWED RESPECT FOR SOLDIERS AND OFFICERS SUCH AS THE ROMAN CENTURION WHEN THEY MAINTAINED PEACE IN SOCIETY AND WERE NOT ENGAGED IN EVIL DEEDS. EARLY CHURCH FATHERS OF CHRISTIANITY TAUGHT THE GOD-GIVEN RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE AS A RACE AND NATION. 

     Inline image 3   Inline image 4 

     Inline image 5    Inline image 6 

  Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS   Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS
 Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS   Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS    
Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS    Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS   
Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS    Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS Image result for HITLER - DISARM THE PEOPLE OF THEIR GUNS
     THIS REPORT ISSUED TO SHOW WHY OUR PROPOSED OMNI LAW NEEDS TO BE PASSED AND SOON IN AMERICA! JAPAN REFUSED TO INVADE AMERICA AFTER PEARL HARBOR BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE HEAVILY ARMED. TOO GREAT OF A RISK TO FIGHT! ANY WOULD-BE TYRANTS IN AMERICA OR FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS LOOKING TO INVADE AMERICA WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DISARMED FIRST SO INVASION AND TAKEOVER OF AMERICA WILL BE EASY FOR THEM THEN. WHY DOES CHINA WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DISARMED OF ALL GUNS? AFTER ALL, ONE OF THE CHINESE GENERALS SAID A FEW YEARS AGO THAT ONCE THEY DEFEATED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND KILLED OFF TWO-THIRDS OF THEM, THEN THE REMAINING AMERICANS STILL ALIVE COULD BE THE SLAVES FOR THE CHINESE COMING TO NORTH AMERICA IN ORDER TO NOW COLONIZE IT FOR CHINA!

     WHEN OUR PROPOSED OMNI LAW IS PASSED, WE WILL SEE THAT YOUR RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AS GUARANTEED IN THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS IS RESPECTED AND UPHELD BY WASH., D.C. WHICH RIGHT NOW IS SCHEMING LIKE MAD HOW TO GET RID OF THIS BILL OF RIGHTS WRITTEN SO YOU WOULD REMAIN FREE AND NOT END UP UNDER A TYRANT GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA! ALSO, THE OMNI LAW CAN BE USED FOR THE USUAL SUCH AS REMOVING MASSIVE REGULATIONS TAKING AWAY ALL YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. AND THE OMNI LAW CAN SKYROCKET THE NATIONAL ECONOMY BY LETTING FREE ENTERPRISE BE FREE ENTERPRISE IN AMERICA INSTEAD OF TRYING TO OPERATE AND SURVIVE IN A MARXIST ECONOMY THAT OBAMA AND ALLIES OF HIS IN CONGRESS, ETC. WANT FOR AMERICA TO END FREE ENTERPRISE FOREVER IN AMERICA.

     OUR WEBSITE IS WWW.FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM OUR EMAIL IS FASTBOOMAMERICANECONOMY.COM@GMAIL.COM  OUR MAILING ADDRESS FOR ORDERS AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT NOT RUN THROUGH OUR WEBSITE IS NIFI, P.O. BOX 1465, SENECA, SC 29679 . MAKE CHECKS, ETC. OUT TO NIFI AND TELL US WHAT THE ORDER OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT IS FOR AS TAKEN FROM THE LISTINGS ON OUR WEBSITE. ALL FINANCES RAISED HELP SPEED UP THE OMNI LAW IN PASSAGE. WHEN PATRICK HENRY SAW THE NEWSPAPER ACCOUNT HOW THE BRITISH WERE GETTING READY TO SEND A HUGE NUMBER OF NEW SOLDIERS TO THE THIRTEEN COLONIES, HE CALLED UPON THE THIRTEEN COLONIES TO RESIST THIS SO THEY WOULD NOT BE PUT IN CHAINS BY THESE SOLDIERS. AND HE UTTERED THE FAMOUS WORDS TO RALLY THE THIRTEEN COLONIES, “GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!” I SPENT ELEVEN CALENDAR YEARS IN MILITARY ACADEMIES AND WHEN I SEE ALL THE REPORTS ON THESE JADE HELM 15 MILITARY EXERCISES IN AMERICA BEING SET UP IN AMERICA, IT SMELLS ROTTEN LIKE A PLANNED MILITARY TAKEOVER OF AMERICA BY OBAMA. AND IF THAT HAPPENS, THEN AMERICA WILL BE TURNED INTO MAYBE THE GREATEST KILLING FIELDS IN ALL OF MILITARY HISTORY AS OBAMA WANTS TO GET RID OF MANY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ACCORDING TO INFORMATION I RECEIVE FROM SOURCES I CANNOT ADMIT TO HAVING. 

     PASS OUR OMNI LAW AND FAST AND AMERICA HAS A FUTURE OF PEACE, NOT COUNTLESS MILLIONS OF AMERICANS KILLED BY APPARENT PLANNED MILITARY CONSPIRACY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE. I CALL UPON CONGRESS TO IMMEDIATELY CANCEL THESE DECLARED ‘JADE HELM 15″ MILITARY EXERCISES AS THESE ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR A NATIONAL DRILL, BUT A MILITARY TAKEOVER OF AMERICA IF ALLOWED TO OCCUR! AND OUR OMNI LAW IN FULL NAME ON OUR WEBSITE IS “THE OMNIBUS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT FOR AMERICA.” IT GIVES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THE RIGHT OF LEGAL REFERENDUM OVER GOVERNMENT SO DICTATORSHIPS BY EXECUTIVE PLAN CANNOT HAPPEN IN AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT MUST NOW BE THE SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE INSTEAD OF THEIR INTENDED MASTER. ALL LAWS AND POLICIES WILL BE CANCELLED OR ELSE APPROVED BY NATIONAL REFERENDUM OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHEN THEY WANT TO ASSERT THEMSELVES TO BE MASTERS OF THE GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF THE INTENDED SERVANT AND THEN SUBJECT OF THE GOVERNMENT.  REMEMBER CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT IS SET UP TO BE THE SERVANT OF THE PEOPLE AND NOT THEIR INTENDED MASTER OVER THE NATION AND PEOPLE!

      YOURS FOR GOD AND COUNTRY, ERASMUS OF AMERICA (PEN NAME FOR THAT AMERICAN LEADER WHO IS REPORTED DESCENDS FROM ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE MAGNA CARTA OF ENGLAND WHICH WAS A GREAT CHARTER FOR FREEDOM OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE CENTURIES AGO.   

     ALSO A REPORTED DESCENDANT OF THE ROBIN HOOD OF LEGEND WHO CHAMPIONED THE PEOPLE AGAINST TYRANNY IN THEIR NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. HOWEVER, HIS REAL NAME WAS DIFFERENT THAN ROBIN HOOD FOR HISTORICAL RECORD!   Image result for ROBIN HOOD

     AND SOME OF MY FOREFATHERS FOUGHT IN THE GREAT AMERICAN REVOLUTION FOR FREEDOM IN 1776 AND AFTERWARDS. THERE IS A LOT OF REBEL BLOOD IN MY ANCESTRY AND WE ALWAYS STOOD FOR THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST TYRANNY OR ATTEMPTED TYRANNY IN THE NATION AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE NATION. SO AMERICAN PEOPLE, JOIN YOUR LATTER DAY ROBIN HOOD IN HIS SYMBOLIC SHERWOOD FOREST AS WE STAND TO HEAD OFF TYRANNY IN AMERICA BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE TO SAVE AMERICA FROM THE EVIL SCHEMING SO AGGRESSIVELY AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TODAY! THE OTHER SIDE IS SCARED OF THE OMNI LAW AS IT RESTORES CONTROL OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT BACK TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN DISENFRANCHISED FROM RUNNING THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT DUE TO THE SCHEMES OF VERY CORRUPT INTERESTS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF WASH., D.C. AS THOMAS JEFFERSON SAID, “RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY IS OBEDIENCE TO GOD!” AND AS BENJAMIN FRANKLIN SAID, “WHERE LIBERTY DWELLS, THERE IS MY COUNTRY!” SONS OF LIBERTY OF 1776, TIME FOR US TO STAND UP ONCE MORE IN AMERICA SO WE DO NOT LOSE ALL THAT 1776 WAS FOUGHT TO OBTAIN FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! )

Gaius Mucius Scaevola

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other people named Mucius Scaevola, see Mucius Scaevola (disambiguation).
Mucius Scævola by Louis-Pierre Deseine, 1791, LouvreMuseum
Gaius Mucius Scaevola was a Roman youth, famous for his bravery.
In 508 BC, during the war between Rome and Clusium, the Clusian king Lars Porsena laid siege to Rome. Mucius, with the approval of the Roman Senate snuck into the Etruscan camp and attempted to murder Porsena. It was the soldiers’ pay day. There were two similarly dressed people on a raised platform talking to the troops. He misidentified Porsena and killed Porsena’s scribe instead. Mucius was captured, and famously declared to Porsena: “I am Gaius Mucius, a citizen of Rome. I came here as an enemy to kill my enemy, and I am as ready to die as I am to kill. We Romans act bravely and, when adversity strikes, we suffer bravely.” He also declared that he was the first of three hundred Roman youths who volunteered to assassinate Porsena at the risk of their own lives.[1]
“Watch,” he declared, “so that you know how cheap the body is to men who have their eye on great glory.” Mucius thrust his right hand into a fire which was lit for sacrifice and held it there without giving any indication of pain, thereby earning for himself and his descendants thecognomen Scaevola, meaning ‘left-handed’. Porsena, shocked at the youth’s bravery, dismissed him from the Etruscan camp, free to return to Rome saying “Go back, since you do more harm to yourself than me”. At the same time, the king also sent ambassadors to Rome to offer peace.[2]
Mucius was granted farming land on the right-hand bank of the Tiber, which later became known as the Mucia Prata (Mucian Meadows).[3]

In popular culture[edit]

 

Permission Denied: Journalist barred from “Friendly Fire” Investigation- Canadians take note!

Posted: 21 Apr 2015 05:05 AM PDT
I began to screen shot this article for tomorrow night’s Transpicuous News, but as I read through it in it’s entirety I realized that this is a major piece of transparency that needs to be seen IN it’s entirety.

It is obvious that this Canadian Globe & Mail Journalist (a leading main stream Canadian News paper/outlet), is seriously pissed about his experience and frustrations in trying to investigate the “friendly fire” death of a Canadian soldier in Iraq.  So much so, that under the cover of a slightly hidden narative, the messages that appear in between the lines of what he doesn’t say, scream louder than words.  This is a VERY strong message to Canadians- to ask the questions that are deliberately and pointedly NOT answered in this article.   The question remains:  Will Canadians actually READ between the lines, or will they turn the page to see who won the latest Leaf game?

I have highlighted various sections of this awesome piece of transparency….. to shine even more light on the unanswered questions.  Or perhaps to ask the questions that are deliberately NOT asked?
I would also say that this story bears vast importance in light of the fact that Canada is sending troops to Ukraine (some are already there, and have been there since December 2014), to work in the same capacity as the Canadian troops in Iraq, ie: as Military “Advisers” and “Trainers”.  Next question: are these Canadian military “advisers” working under the same constraints as their Iraqi placed counter-parts?
d

Access denied: The Globe barred from investigating friendly fire death

MARK MacKINNON
DUBARDAN, IRAQ — The Globe and Mail
Published Friday, Apr. 17 2015, 11:06 PM EDT
Last updated Sunday, Apr. 19 2015, 11:20 PM EDT

PERMISSION
DENIED
By Mark MacKinnon
A peshmerga watch out on the Bashiq Mountains at the front near to Mosul where Canadian soldier Sgt. Andrew Doiron was killed March 6. (Hawre Khalid / Metrography)
 
To get to Bashiq Mountain – and the front line between the Kurdish peshmerga army and forces of the so-called Islamic State – you drive a long bumpy highway through just-planted fields of rice and corn, passing a white-tent settlement for refugees from nearby IS-controlled Mosul, and a succession of tin-roofed Kurdish checkpoints. Somewhere nearby lies the spot where Sergeant Andrew Doiron died in a “friendly fire” incident last month.

The Backstory

Trish McAlaster / The Globe and Mail

The Globe and Mail sent Senior International Correspondent Mark MacKinnon to northern Iraq to investigate the death of a Canadian soldier there in a “friendly fire” incident in March. Canadian special forces are working with the Iraqi Kurdish peshmerga near an active front line in the battle with the so-called Islamic State, but little concrete information about the mission has been disclosed to the public. Mr. MacKinnon, after obtaining permission from the Kurdish presidency and military high command, travelled at great personal risk to Bashiq mountain. That is where the Kurdish unit whose soldiers or soldier – even now, the circumstances of the shooting remain unclear – opened fire on the Canadians with whom they were training. Twice Mr. MacKinnon was blocked by a Kurdish employee of the Canadian military who prevented him, under full view of two Canadian officers, from speaking to soldiers from either side.
Mark MacKinnon, now based in London, has reported from conflict zones across the world and won multiple awards for his journalism. He has been the Globe’s correspondent in the Middle East, Russia and China. Fluent in Russian, he has most recently reported extensively on the Ukraine crisis and is the author of The New Cold War: Revolutions, Rigged Elections and Pipeline Politics, published in 2007 by Random House.

Barring the way is the ambiguous figure of Farhang Afandi, with two flags on his military uniform, a one-man representative of the Byzantine politics and murky chains of command in this breakaway region of northern Iraq.
“I can’t let you go,” Mr. Afandi says, overruling both the office of Kurdish president Masoud Barzani and the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs, both of which made calls last week to facilitate The Globe and Mail’s second effort to reach Bashiq Mountain, after Mr. Afandi denied The Globe permission to travel two days earlier.
He declared that the decisions of the local commander take precedence over those made in the Kurdish capital of Erbil, though the reason Mr. Afandi gives for the refusal shifts over the course of the two conversations. First it’s safety, then it’s a blanket ban on journalists and civilians travelling to the area. Several times “the media” is asked to stop digging into Sgt. Doiron’s death, and to focus on “positive stories” about Canada’s military involvement in northern Iraq.
But although the Peshmerga Ministry says the efforts of Canada’s soldiers in northern Iraq (the Canadian government says there are 69 advisers deployed in Iraqi Kurdistan) are concentrated on the Bashiq Mountain front – and the troops are regularly at the front line, unlike other Western military trainers deployed here – we’re told we can’t see or speak to them.
Mr. Afandi doesn’t actually give his name, and raises his voice when asked what his rank is. “You don’t have the right to ask for my position!” he shouts.
But everyone in the area knows who Mr. Afandi is. He’s the son of Hamid Afandi, a former Minister of Peshmerga Affairs and the current commander of 10,000 men defending district 7.2 of the Kurdish front line, which includes both the green-covered rise of Bashiq Mountain, and the soldiers of the Halgurd Unit that opened fire on Sgt. Doiron, a 31-year-old Moncton native, and three other Canadian soldiers at a checkpoint near here on the night of March 6 in an apparent case of mistaken identity.
The younger Mr. Afandi’s loyalties are complicated. He speaks flawless English and is referred to locally as “our Canadian.” During an unguarded moment, he reveals that he grew up in Ontario, and that he’s actually on contract to the Canadian special forces stationed in northern Iraq, not his father’s peshmerga unit.
He wears a pale green army uniform – lighter in colour than the dark green uniforms most peshmerga wear – with a black “Kurdistan Army” patch on his right shoulder, and a khaki maple leaf on the left. Before he denied The Globe permission to travel on our first effort to reach Bashiq Mountain, Mr. Afandi consulted with two Canadian special forces soldiers who walked into the peshmerga base at Dubardan, at the northern foot of Bashiq Mountain. The two Canadians quickly donned sunglasses and retreated to a back room when told there was a reporter present.

Farhang Afandi, left, speaks flawless English and is referred to by other peshmerga fighters as “our Canadian.” What role he plays in Canada’s mission in Iraq and why he prevented a reporter from investigatin the shooting death of Sgt. Andrew Doiron is unknown.

Canada’s Department on National Defence says Mr. Afandi is a contracted interpreter working for the Canadian military on an “as required basis” in northern Iraq. “He does not hold a military rank or special status but is afforded the professional respect and privileges of a military contractor by Canadian military personnel while he is working for the Canadian Armed Forces in Iraq,” Daniel Le Bouthillier, a spokesman for the department, said in response to e-mailed inquiries from The Globe.
Mr. Le Bouthillier said Mr. Afandi was not a Canadian citizen and cited the Privacy Act when asked whether he had permanent resident status. Mr. Le Bouthillier said Mr. Afandi had purchased his own uniform and that it was “common practice for forces working together to show solidarity by displaying their partner’s cultural symbols or national flags.” 
So who is preventing journalists from visiting the front line at Bashiq Mountain, when the rest of the 1,000-kilometre-long peshmerga frontline is very receptive to media visits?
“We recommend that you contact the Ministry of the Peshmerga,” was Mr. Le Bouthillier’s reply when asked to explain Mr. Afandi’s actions.
But Lieutenant-General Jabar Yawar, a member of the Peshmerga General Command who approved The Globe’s trip to the front, clearly feels he’s reached the extent of his authority when it comes to who can visit Bashiq Mountain. After he gave his permission for a visit to the peshmerga soldiers of the Halgurd unit who were on duty the night Sgt. Doiron was shot, Mr. Afandi blocked us for a second time. I called Lt.-Gen. Yawar. He asked to speak directly to Mr. Afandi – who moved out of earshot to have the conversation – and then apologized after Mr. Afandi handed the mobile phone back. “I’m sorry,” the general said, “this is all I can do.”

Peshmerga fighters check the names of IS fighters in their base in Isqof village at the frontline of Bashiq near Mosul. (Hawre Khalid/ Metrography)

“You can say it’s the local command [that made the decision],” Mr. Afandi said afterwards. “We don’t need civilians wandering around here. The investigation [into Sgt. Doiron’s death] is over.
Mr. Le Bouthillier said he could not say whom Mr. Afandi reported to in either instance, including the first encounter when he was seen consulting with two Canadian special forces officers. “We are not in a position to confirm the contents of every single discussion between CAF members and its partners,” the DND spokesman said, “nor can we confirm if the gentleman was “on the clock” with the CAF or, as previously stated, if he was working for the peshmerga sector commander at the time of the interaction.”

‘THE INVESTIGATION, I THINK, IS FINISHED

The assertion that the investigation into Sgt. Doiron’s death has been completed is a surprise. There has been no public announcement about the outcome of any of the two Canadian inquiries into Sgt. Doiron’s death. The U.S.-led coalition against IS is also investigating, as did the Kurdish government. Fuad Hussein, chief of staff to Mr. Barzani, also refers to the investigation in the past tense.
“The investigation, I think, is finished. It was an unfortunate incident,” Mr. Hussein said in an interview in his Erbil office. “We are shocked always when we lose a peshmerga. …. And then, to lose a soldier who came here to help us, to support us, to give training to us, it was deeper. We are very sorry about that. But this happens, unfortunately, sometimes, in a war.”
Formally or informally, there appears to be a decision on both the Canadian and Kurdish sides to stop talking about – and blaming each other for – the night Sgt. Doiron died. “They told us not to say anything to you,” said a commander in the Halgurd unit who spoke briefly by phone with The Globe from his position on Bashiq Mountain.
In Erbil, Kurdish officials are clearly anxious to repair any damage that was done to the relationship with Canada. They no longer suggest that Sgt. Doiron and the other Canadian troops may have been somewhere they shouldn’t have been on March 6. “Whatever was said in the past, until now, was personal opinion, not formal,” said Lieutenant-General Jabar Yawar, a member of the Peshmerga General Command. “What happened was a great sadness for us.”

A peshmerga fighter stands near a Hummer, which they captured from IS forces near Bashiq, near to Mosul, Iraq. (Hawre Khalid/ Metrography)

But the story blaming the Canadians for what happened is still the one that fighters of the Halgurd unit tell when their commanders aren’t listening.
The front line, they say, is a nebulous thing around Bashiq Mountain. Roughly, the Kurds control the jagged, green-covered mountain, 20-some kilometres north of Mosul. Islamic State – which is also known as ISIS, ISIL and Da’esh – controls the town of Bashiq itself, at the southern foot of the mountain. The Halgurd unit controls the space between the eastern edge of the mountain, up to the bumpy north-south highway that leads to Commander Afandi (the elder)’s headquarters in a converted hospital a short drive north at Dubardan.
Firefights in the area aren’t uncommon – the peshmerga say their positions on the mountain come under small-arms fire about once a week – but nerves tingle the most at night, when any approaching stranger could be an ambush party, or a suicide bomber, sent by IS.
The Halgurd unit was particularly jumpy the night of March 6 because of a clash the day before that had left an Islamic State fighter dead. The militant’s body was still lying where he had been shot – within sight of the Halgurd positions – and the peshmerga were anticipating a move by IS to try to reclaim the corpse.
From there, the stories diverge.
In the Kurdish version, the four Canadians had gone on foot towards the town of Bashiq – Kurdish officials initially said they were helping identify targets for coalition air strikes – without checking in at the Dubardan peshmerga base for that night’s password. When they emerged out of the dark at around 11 p.m. that night, the peshmerga demanded the password. The reply allegedly came in Arabic and one or more Kurds opened fire, shooting that only stopped when the Canadians’ driver, who had been left with his vehicle behind the Kurdish position when the four Canadians proceeded on foot, alerted the peshmerga that they were shooting at their allies.
“We were very sad. I wish it was one of us who had been killed instead, because the Canadians have come here to support us,” said a 32-year-old member of the Halgurd unit who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He said he was not stationed at the checkpoint the shots had been fired from, but the details of the incident were well known to all in the unit. “If you don’t have the password, you can’t even go to the toilet. There are no peshmerga who would speak in Arabic, so we thought they were our enemies.”

Peshmerga weapons and ammunition line an observation post at the Bashiq front line near Mosul, Iraq. (Hawre Khalid/ Metrography)

In the Canadian version, Sgt. Doiron and his comrades had prearranged their movements that night, and had passed two other checkpoints without incident before the third post opened fire on them. Defense Minister Jason Kenney has said the troops weren’t at the front, and weren’t involved in calling in air strikes, but were fired upon as they approached an “observation post” 200 metres behind the line.
It wasn’t the first time Canadian troops have come under fire in northern Iraq. The Department of National Defence has reported three occasions when Canadian troops have exchanged fire with IS fighters since the start of 2015. That’s led to heightened political debate about the mission, with Prime Minister Stephen Harper initially telling the House of Commons last fall that the Canadians were being sent to northern Iraq “to advise and to assist … not to accompany” the Kurdish forces.
That doesn’t match the role the peshmerga describe the Canadians as playing here. “We’ve gotten many benefits from the Canadian side, because they are with us on the front line, advising us. They are on the front line, helping us there,” Lt.-Gen. Yawar said. He positively contrasted the role of the Canadian advisers with those of other coalition countries that insist their trainers must be nowhere near the fighting.
Speaking in January, General Michael Rouleau, commander of the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command, told journalists in Ottawa that “80 per cent” of what Canadian forces did in Iraq happened “kilometres behind the front lines.” He said “the other 20 per cent or so happens in forward positions, mostly close to the front lines but sometimes right at the front lines if that is the only place from where we can accomplish it.”

A peshmerga fighter cover a Doshka machine gun on the frontlines in the Bashiq Mountain near to Mosul, Iraq. (Hawre Khalid/ Metrography)

While Lt.-Gen. Yawar said there is a Canadian military adviser seconded to the Peshmerga General Command in Erbil, there is no Canadian military spokesperson in Iraq. The British, German, Dutch and Italian trainers work under a joint Kurdistan Training Coordination Center that gives regular briefings. The U.S. has a large diplomatic presence here. Yet the only Canadian diplomatic representative in Iraq is a charge d’affaires in Baghdad, housed in the British embassy. That led to brief confusion last year when a Canadian citizen was discovered among the refugees escaping IS, and no one among the Western diplomats stationed in Erbil knew who to contact.
Canada is deeply involved in the war for this country – there are also six CF-18 fighter jets based in Kuwait that carry out bombing runs against IS targets in Iraq and Syria – but diplomatic coverage and consular services for Iraq and Iraqi Kurdistan are provided out of the Canadian embassy in Amman, Jordan.
That’s nearly 900 kilometres from where Canadian troops have been placed, if not on the front line, certainly in the line of fire.

ONE WHO CONFRONTS DEATH

The peshmerga are legendary warriors. The name means “one who confronts death,” and they have been doing that for decades, having fought first Saddam Hussein’s army during the 1980s, then each other during a three-year civil war in the 1990s, then Saddam again following the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, and now IS. But they are collectively still something closer to a people’s militia than a professional army.
While most fighters wear dark green military uniforms donated by the U.S., some still wander around bases and checkpoints in traditional Kurdish attire, their baggy pantaloons held up with cloth belts. Their weapons are primarily Kalashnikov rifles and grenade-launchers – most of them supplied by the U.S. – plus the occasional truck-mounted machine gun. There’s no Kurdish air force, and the peshmerga possess little in the way of tanks or artillery.

Q&A: Department of National Defence

After being blocked this month from visiting the area in northern Iraq close to where Canadian Sgt. Andrew Doiron was killed in a “friendly fire” incident in March, The Globe asked a series of pointed questions of Canada’s Department of National Defence about Farhang Afandi. Mr. Afandi twice denied The Globe permission to venture into the area despite assurances from Kurdish and Peshmerga officials.
The following is a transcript of three separate exchanges with STEVEN CHASE in Ottawa:

Pallbearers from the Canadian Special Operations Regiment carry the casket of Sgt. Andrew Joseph Doiron at Erbil International Airport, Iraq, in this March 8, 2015 handout photograph.

What is Mr. Afandi’s relationship with the Canadian Armed Forces. Is he on a paid contract with the Canadian military? What title or status does he have with the Canadian Armed Forces?
Mr. Farhang Afandi is a contracted interpreter working for the Canadian Armed Forces in Iraq. Mr. Afandi is contracted on an ‘as required basis’ at an hourly rate. He does not hold a military rank or special status but is afforded the professional respect and privileges of a military contractor by Canadian military personnel while he is working for the Canadian Armed Forces in Iraq.
Is he entitled to wear a Canadian-issued uniform? Why is he wearing one?
Mr. Farhang Afandi was not issued, nor is he entitled to be issued, a Canadian military uniform as part of his contracted duties. The military-style uniform he wears was obtained privately and is one of many patterns commonly available to anyone who wishes to purchase one on the open market. Although we can’t speak specifically as to why Mr. Afandi reportedly wears a military-style uniform, it is his personal choice as to what clothing he wishes to wear. It has been observed by Canadian personnel working in the area that there are several patterns and styles of military-type clothing currently being worn by the Peshmerga Forces.
Is he a Canadian citizen?
No, Mr. Farhang Afandi is not a Canadian citizen.
Does Mr. Afandi have any authority granted by Canada or local government to prevent civilians – like, say a Globe and Mail reporter – from travelling on a road in northern Iraq? He blocked our reporter from travelling to Bashiq mountain last week, overruling the office of Kurdish President Masoud Barzani and the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs.
Mr. Afandi’s authority in the region is best answered by the Ministry of the Peshmerga. He often represents the Peshmerga sector commander when not acting as a part time, as needed [sic] interpreter. While Canadian soldiers work closely with our partners in the Kurdish Regional Government and the Ministry of the Peshmerga, Canadian troops do not control access to locations and the decision to grant access rests solely with the Kurdish Regional Government and the Ministry of the Peshmerga. As such we cannot speculate on why access was restricted as numerous factors including the reporter’s personal safety and ongoing operations may have impacted that decision.
Is Mr. Afandi a permanent resident of Canada?
Due to the Privacy Act, we do not have access to this information and would recommend contacting the Ministry of the Peshmerga, or Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
Does the military have any concern about the fact that Mr Afandi is wearing a khaki maple leaf on his uniform?
The Canadian Armed Forces deeply values the relationship with the Peshmerga and it is a common practice for forces working together to show solidarity by displaying their partner’s cultural symbols or national flags.

*side note by me: this is BULLSHIT!  As ex military, for a fact a person NOT from the Canadian military cannot represent themselves AS Canadian military by wearing the identifying marks of the Canadian Military!!*

Two Canadian special forces soldiers were observed beyond Mr. Afandi when he turned back The Globe and Mail reporter. They put on sunglasses and retreated when our reporter approached. Did they ask Mr. Afandi to bar The Globe and Mail reporter from travelling to Bashiq mountain? To put it another way: Was Mr. Afandi acting on a request/order from the Canadian military or government when he barred a Globe and Mail reporter from travelling to Bashiq mountain last week?
While Canadian soldiers work closely with our partners in the Kurdish Regional Government and the Ministry of the Peshmerga, Canadian troops do not control access to locations and the decision to grant access rests solely with the Kurdish Regional Government and the Ministry of the Peshmerga. As such we cannot speculate on why access was restricted as numerous factors including the reporter’s personal safety and ongoing operations may have impacted that decision. We recommend that you contact the Ministry of the Peshmerga if you have further questions regarding their operations in the region.
Farhang Afandi blocked our reporter from travelling to Bashiq mountain last week, over ruling permission granted by the office of Kurdish president Masoud Barzani and the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs. You’re telling us that you had nothing to do with his decision to turn back Mark MacKinnon. Will the Canadian military/DND agree not to block Mr. MacKinnon from traveling to Bashiq Mountain if he returns?
The Globe and Mail is in the area of their own volition, as there is no media embedding program as part of our advise and assist mission in Iraq. It is the Globe and Mail’s responsibility to have all proper local approvals for access. Given access is granted by local authorities, it is not within the CAF’s purview to ‘block’ or restrict reporters, nor is it within our power to grant access. We are respectful of our partners’ authorities and responsibilities and cannot make promises on issues that aren’t within our scope.
You’ve told me that Mr. Afandi works for you as an interpreter and I understand from your statements that this is his only task for CAF.‎ And you’ve said he also works for the Peshmerga. Was he on the clock for Canada when he turned Mr. MacKinnon away or was he working for the Peshmerga at the time? We ask – and this is a very important fact – because our reporter saw Mr. Afandi consult with [two] Canadian special forces soldiers before turning away Mr. MacKinnon.
We are not in a position to confirm the contents of every single discussion between CAF members and its partners, nor can we confirm if the gentleman was ‘on the clock’ with the CAF or, as previously stated, if he was working for the Peshmerga sector commander at the time of the interaction.
It is important to note that the DND/CAF remain committed to being as open and transparent about this mission as possible, without compromising operational security. This is why we have, and will continue to provide media with significant information through technical briefings, imagery and video footage.
What is the status of the CANSOFCOM (special forces) and military police investigations into the Doiron death?
The investigations into the death of Sgt. Andrew Doiron are proceeding normally. A precise timeline cannot be provided for their completion, as our focus is on taking the time necessary to do the job properly.
Has a Board of Inquiry been convened into the Doiron death? If not, why?
A Board of Inquiry (BOI) has not been initiated into the death of Sgt. Doiron; a summary investigation (SI) has instead been ordered. SIs are full investigations that allow for the gathering of information, determination of facts, and generation of recommendations in a timely manner. It is also important to note that an SI does not preclude the convening of a BOI at a later date, should the chain of command determine that such a measure is necessary.

Asked what Kurdish fighters need most, the fighter from the Halgurd unit who spoke to The Globe immediately replied “money.” Front-line fighters are paid just $400 to $500 a month, he said, forcing many – even in the middle of the war against Islamic State – to request time away from their units to work second jobs to support their families.

Divisions and resentments from the 1990s civil war still linger, adding to the confusion around who gives the orders in a place like Bashiq Mountain. Lt.-Gen. Yawar, the man who authorized The Globe’s trip to the front, has three portraits of former Iraqi president Jalal Talabani in his office, indicating his loyalty to Mr. Talabani’s Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, one of the belligerents in the 1990s. Commander Afandi was peshmerga minister to Mr. Barzani’s rival Kurdistan Democratic Party, and the fighters of the Halgurd unit are drawn from KDP loyalists.
But, despite all the challenges – and with the aid of coalition trainers and warplanes – the Kurds are slowly advancing along most of their 1,000-kilometre front line, and Islamic State is on the retreat.

THE BATTLE FOR MOSUL

That, perhaps, is why the Canadians and Kurds stationed at Bashiq Mountain have decided to stop bickering about who was at fault the night Sgt. Doiron was killed. There is a war to win.
Looming large for the peshmerga and their allies is the city of Mosul, the heart of Islamic State operations in Iraq, and the city where IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared himself last summer to be the “emir” of a new “caliphate stretching across much of western Iraq and eastern Syria.
Mosul, in Saddam-era guidebooks to Iraq is described as “a city for walking” that was undergoing “a great burst of modernity.” But Mosul has been in a state of near-continuous war since the U.S. invasion of 2003. The city emerged as a centre of Sunni Arab resistance first to the U.S. occupation, then to the Iranian-backed governments that emerged in Baghdad. Saddam’s sons, Uday and Qusay, made their final stand at a safe house in Mosul after the fall of Baghdad. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the founder of al-Qaeda in Iraq – the predecessor organization to Islamic State – frequently used Mosul as a base as he waged his holy war against the U.S. Army.
Although most religious and ethnic minorities immediately fled Mosul when IS entered the city last June, many Sunni Arab residents initially welcomed the jihadis as preferable to the Shiite-dominated Iraqi army. After 10 months of harsh Islamic law, power outages and water shortages, it’s not clear how much support remains for IS among the million-plus people believed to still be living in Mosul (the pre-war population was 1.8 million). But it’s also unclear that they would welcome “liberation” by either the Iraqi army or the peshmerga.
That’s exactly what’s being planned, however. After the Iraqi army, with the backing of Shia militias, drove Islamic State out of the central city of Tikrit last week, Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi flew to Erbil to discuss with Mr. Barzani the terms for Kurdish involvement in an assault on Mosul.
Both sides are wary. The Kurds fear being further drawn into an ethnic or sectarian conflict, while the Iraqi government worries the peshmerga won’t later withdraw from areas (such as the neighbourhoods of Mosul that lie east of the Tigris River) it considers part of historic Kurdistan. But while any push towards Mosul is likely months away, if not longer, preparations are already being made.
“The decision is that [the peshmerga] will take part in recapturing Mosul,” said Lt.-Gen. Yawar. “Our concern is what role we will play: Will we enter [the outskirts] of Mosul but not enter the city? Or enter the city and then come out again? We still need to discuss these things.”
Such a battle, he said, is where the Canadian advisers will be most helpful. Despite their long experience with war, the peshmerga have mostly fought defensive battles, usually on mountainous terrain. The Canadians, and other coalition advisers, are helping prepare the peshmerga for an offensive along a long front, over flat ground – and eventually for the kind of house-by-house, street-by-street urban warfare that would be required to oust IS from Mosul.
Mr. Hussein, the presidential chief-of-staff, said the training is very welcome, but added that he wishes Canada and the West would supplement it by providing the peshmerga with the modern tanks and heavy weapons he said could bring the war against IS to a quicker and less costly conclusion.
He said the Kurds have paid for every advance so far with “peshmerga lives,” with some 1,200 Kurdish fighters killed and more than 5,000 injured since the conflict against Islamic State began last summer. He said the peshmerga often find themselves in battle against the kind of M-1 Abrams tanks and howitzer artillery – supplied by the U.S. to the Iraqi army, then seized by IS last summer during its lightning advance – that the West refuses to provide to its Kurdish allies.
At the Dubardan base, two rusty armoured personnel carriers sit parked beside a small Russian-made tank that looks like it saw battle during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. According to the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs, Kurdish forces have just 150 such tanks – all of them supplied by the Soviet Union to Saddam Hussein’s army – scattered along its front line with Islamic State.
“If we had heavy weapons, we could reach the same victories that we are now, but with less victims. We are gaining these victories, most of the time, with the blood of our peshmerga,” Mr. Hussein said.
He said the Kurdish leadership has requested heavy weaponry many times, at various levels, in its communications with Western governments, but so far has received only a smattering of help: anti-tank missiles from Germany, truck-mounted heavy machine guns from France, and half a dozen anti-mine robots from Canada that have yet to be deployed. But no tanks.
The request, and the West’s slow response to it, are a reminder of the higher stakes swirling in the background of this war as the investigation into Sgt. Doiron’s death is quickly concluded away from prying eyes.
The Kurds are the West’s willing foot soldiers against IS, both because they fear the spread of extremism and because they are gathering ground ahead of an eventual, inevitable push for independence from an Iraq they see as broken beyond repair. The West is keen to aid the Kurds in the first effort, but nervous about offering any help that could later be repurposed towards the second ambition. (There’s a fear that tanks, for instance, could one day be used in a war of independence.)
Ten months ago – in the wake of Islamic State’s shocking capture of Mosul – Mr. Hussein told The Globe that it was time to “prepare the ground” for a referendum on Kurdish independence. Last week, sitting in the same office, he edged away from such talk, saying the more pressing priority is the war against IS, and that the timing of any future referendum will depend on “the political situation” in Iraq.
The way Iraqi Kurdistan sees its deal with the West is clear. The peshmerga are fighting IS on everyone’s behalf now, and even willing to help in an assault on Mosul, in hopes that the West will reciprocate eventually with support for the Kurdish goal of independence from Iraq. Dropping the Kurdish claim that it was the Canadian special forces troops who were at fault the night of March 6 aids the long-term Kurdish goal of shoring up the alliance between Ottawa and Erbil.
“We faced many tragedies in our history. Sometimes, we faced our tragedies alone. We were crying alone. People were not ready to listen to how we felt. This is part of this history also,” Mr. Hussein explained when asked how important the Canadian presence here is to Iraqi Kurds. “When Canada came and supported our peshmerga and gave them training and helped us, for us it was very important…. It gives us more hope, for the future also.”
Back at the base at the foot of Bashiq Mountain, the younger Mr. Afandi leaves no doubt what cause he sees himself serving as he keeps journalists away from the place where Sgt. Doiron was killed. “I hope to see you another time,” he says, smiling, friendly only as we depart. “I will welcome you happily on the day Kurdistan becomes independent.”
Steven Chase in Ottawa contributed to this story

 

HATONN: TRUTH CAN BE A THREAT TO THOSE WITH RIGID BELIEFS

1/10/97 #1   HATONN
A NAME BY ANY OTHER SPELLING IS NOT THE SAME NAME!

Let us look here, for a moment, at “words”.  Now think about how many times you MISinterpret, or simply forget, a name.  Let us say you are a writer, even of news items, and you are faced with identification of say, Quadafi.  I have seen it written as Kadaphi, Quadaffi, Quadaphu, and Kadafi.  Which is correct?  ALL are correct unless you wish to personalize ONE as head of Libya.  The same with Mr. Farrakhan who is over there in Libya meeting with this person named (possibly) above.  Who is this Farrakhan?  Or is it Farikkan?  How about Farrukaun?  Could it be Farikhan?  Perhaps it is Farrukhaun?  Is THIS one important?  Only if you are referring specifically to the Leader of the Nation of Islam in the United States of America!
Let’s go a bit further now and into something that causes Dharma a LOT OF GRIEF as people pour on the “I know better” and “you speak heresy”.  Your paper is good if you would just leave out the garbage about God, because you have it ALL WRONG.”  Wrong?  We have it all wrong?  From whence did YOU get your information?  Let us even look at the word “whence”, or is it wince?  Perhaps it is whince?  Or, wence?  Does it matter?  Yes, wince means to “pull back quickly” as in a sort of grimmace, or is it grimmice?  Perhaps it is gremace?  At any rate, MY usage of the word whence is to inquire of YOUR source of your information so bluntly judging ours to be wrong?  Have you ever been mistakenly called by another name or ARRESTED for a crime committed by another because your name is close to the same and identification is not fully explored?  Lots of people have even been slain for lack of proper identification.  Don’t you have better methods for full identification than they did in Jerusalem some 2000 years ago?  Still, misinformation is pressed forth in the media, in the press, in everyday language.  How do YOU pronounce Brzezinski?  You know, that chap called Zbigniew.  He is a VERY important person in your world and how many of you can spell his name if I take away the spelling laid forth here?  Perhaps your name is Brownen, but perhaps the “en” is not pronounced clearly–how think you might be called?


Well, ladies and gentlemen, whether or not YOU LIKE IT–there was no Judas Iscariot who betrayed a man named Immanuel that you call Jesus.  “Jesus” was a name attached to Esu (I)(J)(E)mmanuel of the House of Joseph AFTER Paul (Saul of Tarsus) went to Greece after the alleged crucifixion of “Jesus”.  I am NOT arguing religion–I AM pointing out that accidental, if not deliberate, tampering and mistranslation has TAKEN PLACE.  Remember that the New Testament was not written until some 300 YEARS after the departure of this Jesus man.  And, furthermore, JESUS NEVER WROTE ANYTHING!  Therefore, you have unlearned men carving or scratching in stone some tales long AFTER the events.  Do you think you could give ACCURATE information even TODAY about the downed TWA Flight 800?  Oh?  It was Pan AM?  Are YOU sure?  Who told you?  Have those sources EVER made an error?  Now, please, tell me the list of passengers on that crashed plane.  Please make sure you SPELL their names correctly because it CERTAINLY DOES MATTER.  Oh, and by the way, I want CORRECT information as in the time of day, date, exact coordinates and all the valid information making up FACT, not FICTION.
You who are unbending in your staunch belief that a thing has to be a certain way–how can you know?  Even the person complaining the loudest and most nastily about this topic misspelled word after word in his diatribe.  But what do we get in counter-lip?  “Well, damn it, you know what I mean…” “I” know what “YOU” mean?  No, I do not know what you mean.  Further, it matters little what you mean if you be incorrect, other than perhaps YOU ARE THE FOOL and not I.

JUDAS ISCARIOTH, JUDAH IHARIOT, JUDAS ISCARIOT

So, will the REAL kisser of death and betrayer of one Esu Emmanuel stand up?  No, I didn’t say “Jesus”, although I can toss that one in for your own comfort.  Will the real betrayer of Jesus stand forth, please?  IS THERE POSSIBILITY AFTER 2000 YEARS THAT SOMEONE MISSPELLED THE NAME?  How about the fact that FALSE INFORMATION was, as in most crimes, projected to protect the guilty?  The guilty in this instance being the son of a HIGH-RANKING PHARISEE.  The man named Judas Iscarioth (THAT YOU FALSELY LABEL JUDAS ISCARIOT) was the closest friend to the Master Teacher of any of his friends.  However, the one who betrayed the Master Teacher was Judah Iharioth, the son of the Town Political Head, a Pharisee.  Does this make any difference?  Of course it makes tremendous difference!
What if your name is Clinton, even Bill Clinton, and the police come and arrest you for “Clinton’s” indiscretions with one Paula Jones?  Do you even know this Paula Jones?  Would you be upset or anything?  Once they execute you for these crimes, can you protect yourself?  How?  If the political powers that be DECIDE TO PLACE BLAME ON YOU TO PROTECT THE PRESIDENT, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO PROVE YOU ARE NOT BILL CLINTON?  AFTER ALL, THAT IS YOUR NAME AND PERHAPS THAT HAS BEEN YOUR NAME FOR EXACTLY AS LONG AS IT HAS BEEN SLICK WILLIE’S NAME.  Clinton’s Father was not even “Clinton”, he came from the Blyth family tree of the Rockefeller clan.
So, COULD SOMEONE, in 2000 years with thousands of language translations, be INCORRECT–possibly?
So again, when anyone bashes me and/or my secretary for writing something, is it not just possibly that perhaps someone else could have erred?  I am not “protecting” as the accusation goes, one Judas Iscariot–there simply was no Judas Iscariot in any connection, when the Teacher was betrayed.  Perhaps you might wish to consider just WHO is in error?
There are even errors in AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL.  The scrolls are in ancient Arabic-Hebrew, translated into Greek, among other languages, and then finally into German.  How many of THESE LANGUAGES do “YOU” speak?  Well, if you didn’t speak Ancient Arabic then you MADE MISTAKES in both spelling and translation for one language is symbols and the other alphabetic–but try YOUR ENGLISH ALPHABET on Ancient Greek!  Modern Greek?  Well, how about Ancient Aramaic–so, do you speak fluent Aramaic?  In what language WAS IT that translated Judas Iscariot into placement?  And believe me, even you skeptics, this new Emmanuelian theory of such as Christianity was the cult to end all cults!  Oh, you thought it was a Jesuan Theory of something or other?  No, the man (Master Teacher) taught the TRUTH of “CHRIST”-ness versus the concept of EVIL being the right way to go.  So, this “Jesus” was called the Teacher of Christ Theory of “goodness” (GOD-NESS), the Atonian realization of THE “ONE” GOD.  He did not, either, blunder into calling God, The Creation.  There is “God” and there is “The Creation” and one is a PART of the other, but is NOT the SAME.
So then, does Dharma have total recall?  Does she have total visual memory retention?  Does she have a photographic memory?  No, none of the above.  She is bright and can LEARN–but I HAVE TOTAL RECALL, A PHOTOGRAPHIC RETENTION, etc.  All she needs to have to work for me is being able to type letters on a keyboard and accept the responsibility of not EDITING, to please her “rathers”, the material.  Have you people not had enough LIES?  You are in a mess, people, so DON’T YOU WANT TRUTH in order to straighten out your very lives?  Certainly NO ONE FROM HERE IS FORCING ANYTHING ONTO ANYONE!  You don’t think much of my input?  Well, frankly, I don’t think much of your unlearned input.  I look and study ALL; you REFUSE to even consider possibilities.  Who might well have the most knowledge?  I didn’t say intelligence, I said “knowledge”.  If my input is incorrect–PROVE IT.  I can PROVE your input is incorrect.  I can begin to prove it by asking someones of you, who had a birthday last May, on what day of the week did that fall?  What did you have for breakfast that morning?  Did they bomb the Oklahoma City building that morning or did they burn Waco–do you remember?  Oh, that was in April?  April 9th, 12th or 19th?  And was it LAST year?  From which channel or radio station were you gaining your information or was it from a friend or paper?  What friend and what paper and where did FRIEND get his/her information?  How many days lapsed before the Natives of Alaska learned of the Bombing?  How about Brazilians?
Check yourself right now: Do you have a current set of Encyclopedias?  Do you have a current World Almanac?  HOW MUCH OF EITHER HAVE YOU ACTUALLY STUDIED WITH INTENT TO KNOW CONTENTS?  THEN WHY DO YOU TREAT YOUR VERY SOUL WITH SO LITTLE ATTENTION TO ITS NEED FOR TRUTH?
Tell me what your pancreas does, please.  How about the hypothalamus?  The pineal?  What about the Eustachian tubes?  Or is that eustacian tubes?  Perhaps Eustacean?  Your Philappoians?  Phaloppians?  Felopians?  Falopians?  Well, which is it?  “It” are “they” and a female cannot bear children if those tubes are not present and open.  HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW ABOUT YOURSELF?  Strangely enough, I know all about MYSELF.  Further, I can tell you that in English it is Fallopian.  In Greek or Latin, however, it is not even recognizable as the SAME thing.  How dare you even pronounce me an evil liar because YOU DON’T KNOW VERY MUCH ABOUT ANYTHING?
So, the man you NOW call “Jesus”, but was not, was NOT BETRAYED by Judas Iscariot and no matter how I might wish to make it be so–for you, it is NOT TRUE.  All the voting-in of the names and circumstances WILL NOT MAKE IT ONE IOTA TRUTH.  And no, I don’t care what Paul (remember old Saul of Tarsus, the ENEMY of Jesus Christ [as you label him??]) wrote or said about the subject.  I don’t care what Peter wrote–if it was not so, it was not, and IS NOT so.  Truth does NOT change with the whims of man.  Truth is infinite and never changes–lies are like the wind and never hold truth–not even for one moment in time.  And when you speak of Judeo-Christian religions, you are as absurd in every instance as saying the Lie-Truth religion.  It simply cannot be for one is in extreme opposition to the other.  If you have Jewish religion which denies a messiah in the form of Emmanuel or Jesus or whatever and you have another based on the very belief that Jesus is Christ–you have extreme opposites and they cannot meld one within the other.  If you want to have a religion based on mutual possibilities–try the CORRECT history books, not such as a “BIBLE” called “holy”.
If, however, YOU DESIRE TRUTH IN SPIRITUALITY and wish to live those ideals–you must go within and KNOW TRUTH, PRESENT TRUTH AND ACT TRUTH.  Anything that moves you away from God of Light IN TRUTH–is “away from God” and is simply identified and defined as “evil”, no more or less.  If you assume there to be no evil–then look again at the definition for there is evil in abundance and you go further and pronounce “SIN” upon the actions.  Well, “sin” is an error in efforting to reach that which is perfection.  Good or bad has little meaning.  Right and Wrong are totally useful words.


Source:  CONTACT:  THE PHOENIX PROJECT, January 14, 1997, Volume 15, Number 10, Pages 21-22.
http://www.phoenixarchives.com/contact/1997/0197/011497.pdf

 

THE NEXT FINANCIAL TSUNAMI JUST BEGAN IN TEXAS

The last financial Tsunami was a doozer that almost destroyed the global financial system. It was the collapse of the Wall Street Mortgage Backed Securities bubble in March 2007. The results of that collapse are still very much with the world today. Never in the one hundred some years of the Federal Reserve Bank has the Fed held interest rates at an artificial near-zero level for what is soon to mark eight years duration. Not even during the 1930’s Great Depression were rates kept so low so long. It is not a sign of a healthy banking system, friends.

Now a new Financial Tsunami is beginning, this one, of all places, in the Texas, North Dakota and other USA shale oil regions. Like the so-called US sub-prime real estate crisis, the oil shale junk bond default crisis is but the cutting front of the first wave of what promises to be a far more dangerous series of financial Tsunami long waves.
Banking system vulnerability greater

 
I say more dangerous because of what governments in the USA, EU and elsewhere did after 2007 to make sure no repeat of that bubble-cum-collapse-of bubble cycle could repeat.
In a word, they did nothing. What they did do—explode US Federal debt and bloat the credit of the central bank to historic highs leaving the USA in far worse shape to deal with the unfolding crisis.
Aside from a few cosmetic face-saving new laws, they have done nothing. No CEO of a major criminal Wall Street bank went to prison. No mega-bank, “too big to fail” was forced to break up their trillion dollar balance sheet as they were after 1933 when the Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act forcing banks to divest their in-house stock and bond securities businesses to avoid the same conflicts of interest that reemerged after Bill Clinton signed the Glass-Steagall repeal in 1999 and banks and insurance companies and investment firms merged into giants so large Congress was terrified to touch them. No law has been passed forcing disclosure of the off-balance-sheet bank derivatives positions. Like in 2007 it is all opaque, like bankers prefer.
But something has changed. More than $700 billion of US taxpayer dollars were donated to the health and welfare of the six or seven criminal institutions called Wall Street banks. Four of those Wall Street banks—JP MorganChase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America—hold 93% of the total USA banking industry notional amounts of derivative contracts, a market that in April 2014 was valued grossly or notionally at $231 trillion, yes, trillion. Were the offsetting derivatives contracts netted out, the bank risks of those four Wall Street banks would still be $279 billion of credit risk bank exposure, all concentrated in the four largest US banks.
In a full-blown meltdown or Tsunami like 2008, when no bank dared trade with any other bank for fear it would default, all calculations are out the window as there is no derivative or hedge against a systemic meltdown. In 2007-2015 the Fed reacted with unprecedented money printing to feed the brain-dead Wall Street banks. It was called Quantitative easing or QE.
The Fed created out of thin air more than $3.3 trillion worth of what they call Reserve Bank Credit after September 2008. In the QE process the Fed bought financial assets from commercial banks, mainly the Big Four or top 25 banks and other private institutions like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac mortgage companies. The Fed bought US government bonds from the private banks, the heart of the corrupt Federal Reserve private bank system. And more recently the fed has bought $1.7 trillion of toxic mortgage backed securities from the same banks. That Fed buying called QE pumped urgently need liquidity on to those mega banks.
Only this is not 1986 and the US banking system and US economy is not comparable to that in 1986. Today the US Government is choking in $18 trillion in Federal debt. In 1986 it was a “mere” $2 trillion. The US economy in 1986 still produced manufacturing jobs that employed real working people. Today those jobs have been outsourced through to places like Mexico or China or Vietnam or even, yes, Russia. And the banking system of the USA is on year seven of artificial life support known as Quantitative Easing.
According to John Williams who produces a widely-regarded invaluable independent check on government statistical lying in his Shadow Government Statistics, the true unemployment rate in the United States in the beginning of 2015 is not the politically rigged 5% President Obama so proudly points to. Rather is is over 23%, Great Depression levels, and more than double the 12% he reckoned just before the 2007 crisis began.
What have the banks done with the Fed money? They have flooded the stock markets, emerging markets like Brazil or India or even Russia, all in search of new gains just as they flooded into junk real estate loans after the collaose of the dot.com IT bubble in 2000. And they have poured hundreds of billions of dollars into the US shale oil bonanza, creating a new bubble, much like the 1999-2000 dot.com bubble or the 2004-2007 sub-prime bubble. Now that US shale oil bubble is beginning to deflate, fast.
The Saudis strike
Recall that in September 2014, in a misguided attempt to up the heat on the Russian economy and weaken Vladimir Putin, Secretary of State John Kerry flew to Saudi Arabia to meet with the dying King Abdullah. Kerry reportedly proposed the Saudis dump oil, then selling for around $100 a barrel, onto the market at drastically lower prices. It was crude, in the sense not of crude oil but of a poorly thought-out crude rerun of a tactic then Vice President Bush and Secretary of State George Schultz made with the Saudis in 1986 when oil prices plunged to below $10 a barrel and prepared the financial backdrop for the collapse of the Soviet Union three years later.

What Kerry and the Washington neo-conservatives neglected to look at was the double agenda of those sly Saudi Wahhabite royals. They gleefully agreed to Help Washington deepen Russia’s financial crisis and to hitting their Shi’ite foe Iran by hitting oil. But they also saw a golden chance to rid themselves of their new rival for global oil supremacy, namely, the United States, specifically the shale oil sector.

A Sorcerer’s Apprentice
Owing to the geology in extracting gas from shale rock interstices by underground fracturing or fracking, by pumping millions of gallons of chemicals into the rocks, shale oil and gas deposits deplete far far more rapidly than conventional gas or oil deposits. That has meant shale companies had to borrow more and more to drill new wells in order to maintain oil volumes. So long as oil was above $100 a barrel, it was still a profit bonanza for banks as for shale oil companies.
Those new shale oil wells cost money. After 2011 Wall Street banks hungry for new profit in a depressed economy teamed up with shale oil drilling companies in what soon became a remake of the Goethe Sorcerer’s Apprentice, where this time he can’t stop the flow of oil. As a result of shale oil, the USA has surpassed Saudi Arabia to become the world’s largest oil producer, but the rising oil supply is worsening the US oil industry crisis.
When Fed interest rates were zero, Wall Street liquidity seemingly unlimited and oil prices well above $100 a barrel as they were since 2011, the money flowed into shale gas until the gas supplies collapsed the price. At that point, around 2011 shale drilling shifted to far more profitable shale or tight oil drilling. Here the debt began to rise like in every previous speculative bubble. Bankers have short memory on Wall Street when they know the Government will always be there because they are “too big to fail.” So they have created the shale oil bubble with no regard to risk.
Junk bonds
Since the shale oil boom took flight in 2011 Wells Fargo and JP Morgan have both issued shale oil company loans of $100 billion.There has been a huge rise in high risk high return bonds, so called “junk bonds.” They earned the appropriate name because in event of a company’s going bankrupt, they become just that—junk. The bonds have been issued by Wall Street banks to shale oil and gas companies since the bubble started in 2011. The US oil and gas industry share of junk bonds has been the fastest growing portion of the overall US junk bond sector of the bond market.
Now as oil prices hover around $49 a barrel, the shale oil companies that indebted themselves with junk bonds to finance more drilling are themselves facing bankruptcy or default more and more every additional day the US crude oil price remains this low. Their shale projects were calculated when oil was $100 a barrel, less than a year ago. Their minimum price of oil to avoid bankruptcy in most cases was $65 a barrel to $80 a barrel. Shale oil extraction is unconventional and more costly than conventional oil. Douglas-Westwood, an energy advisory firm, estimates that nearly half of the US oil projects under development need oil prices greater than $120 per barrel in order to achieve positive cash flow. 
Now as the Saudi oil price operation enters its eighth month with no end in sight, the shale oil dominoes are beginning to fall. US shale oil producers Quicksilver Resources, American Eagle Energy, Saratoga Resources and BPZ Resources all missed interest payments this year. Houston oil field service firm Cal Dive International just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Moody’s Investors Service just downgraded Swiss oil rig contractor Transocean’s $9.1 billion in debt.
The US energy sector’s high-yield bonds – so-called “junk bonds” considered at risk of default – have climbed to $247 billion. But the implosion of the shale oil bubble and its debt is just beginning. Because the shale oil producers are desperately trying to stay afloat and hope for higher oil prices to stay alive they are forced into the paradoxical position of pumping as much oil as possible in order to service their debt to the banks to avoid default. That has meant record volumes of oil flooding the US market in recent months, pushing prices even lower.
And to make the oil glut even worse, the Saudis have apparently no intention of easing on the price of oil until far more blood flows in the streets of Laredo and across Wall Street. In the first week of April the US crude oil inventories surged 11 million barrels – three times more than expected – to a modern-day record 482 million barrels, the biggest one-week increase since 2001. Stockpiles in Cushing, Oklahoma, rose by 1.2 million barrels, far more than expected. On top of the flood of oil in the US led by increasingly strapped shale oil producers, Saudi oil production rose to 10.3 million barrels per day in March, their highest monthly total on record.
Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi said he was ready to “improve” prices only if producers outside the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) joined the effort. But even in OPEC Iran is boosting oil sales to China and Japan despite sanctions, with prospect of a possible, if increasingly unlikely, US lifting of Iran sanctions in July, bringing a big increase of Iran oil on the market. Iraq and Libya also increased their output in March and Russia is pumping all it can, meaning the world oil glut will likely run to at least end of 2015 according to Olivier Jakob at Swiss-based Petromatrix. The US Energy Department EIA estimates US oil prices will fall now another $5 to $15 a barrel to levels around $35 to $45 a barrel because of the glut continuing, which in turn will trigger a chain reaction of shale oil sector bankruptcies and loss of tens of thousands of well-paying US oilrig jobs from Pennsylvania to Texas to North Dakota to Arizona to California.
There is a symbiotic bond between the shale oil industry and the Wall Street banks that financed the shale bonanza. The banks have an estimated $498 billion in loan exposure to the US energy sector. Wells Fargo bank got 15 percent of its investment banking fee revenue in 2014 from the oil and gas industry. At Citigroup, the business accounted for roughly 12 percent, according to Dealogic. Now, as the problems mount, the Wall Street banks that financed the shale energy deals are having trouble offloading the debt as news of the deepening crisis spreads. This time Wall Street may have trouble finding naïve Chinese bankers willing to buy US toxic waste oil loans as they were lured into buying toxic waste real estate sub-prime mortgage debt before 2008.
It isn’t only oil companies that are beginning to go under. The entire infrastructure of the USA energy boom, one of the only growth areas in a depressed economy, has financed new homes by oil employees, oil company office buildings from Houston Texas to North Dakota, creating growth pockets amid the larger Detroit-like depression regions. Now bank lenders are reassessing risks in shale energy towns as roughly $1.1 trillion of property loans come due across the US over the next three years, according to real estate debt analyst Richard Hill at Morgan Stanley.
The collapse of the shale oil junk bond market will be the start of the next Tsunami underwater financial earthquake. The entire Junk Bond market has boomed as banks in the USA and even in the EU and elsewhere assumed so long as the Fed kept rates at zero, and so long as oil was at $100 a barrel. Bank risk was zero and rewards were double digit interest rates on junk. In the end that junk, shale and other, is now in an early wave Tsunami despite zero fed interest rates, because of the falling oil prices. Martin S. Fridson, a prominent analyst of the high-yield junk bond market, sees as much as $1.6 trillion in high-yield defaults coming in a new wave he expects to begin shortly.
Fridson said that five months ago. The “shortly” has now arrived. The next months promise a bare knuckle ride in the rotted debt-bloated US financial sector that will promise an even more dangerous rerun of the global crisis after 2008. The banks most exposed are JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co.—the same criminal enterprises that created the 2007 mortgage-backed-securities collapse and virtually every financial collapse crisis since 1907. Some might think it high time soon to consider another banking model for the USA, perhaps bringing the CEOs responsible before the courts, nationalizing the banks too big to fail, breaking them up into “bite sized” pieces, removing at least that cancer from the economy to let healthy investment resume by honest banks in honest people in America once more as we did only some sixty years ago.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/04/17/the-next-financial-tsunami-just-began-in-texas/

 

EXCLUISVE VIDEO INSIDE CLOSED JADE HELM STATE WAL-MART REVEALS ATTEMPT TO HIDE SOMETHING WITH COPS GUARDING LOADING DOCKS AND ENTRANCES – WHAT IS WAL-MART HIDING?

With the closure of at least 5 Wal-Mart stores in 4 Jade Helm linked states triggering martial law and economic collapse concerns, citizen reporters are springing to action across America, taking videos and pictures of what they are seeing at their local shuttered Wal-Marts as seen in the 1st video below from DAHBOO777.
Exclusive Video Inside Closed Jade Helm State Wal-Mart Reveals Attempt To Hide Something With Cops Guarding Loading Docks And Entrances - What Is Wal-Mart Hiding
Dahboo gets an exclusive report from one of his subscribers who got inside of the Pico Rivera Wal-Mart shutting down in California and reveals an attempt by Wal-Mart to prevent any information about what is going on inside of their store from getting out to the public.

Besides telling this videographer to shut down her camera as seen in the video below, the video also provides evidence of Wal-Mart setting up shelves as barriers to prevent anyone inside from seeing anything going on anywhere else within the store as well as police officers not only outside of the store but outside of the receiving docks as well, leading to concerns about exactly what it is they are expecting to receive and what they have planned for these monstrous buildings.
In the 2nd video below we’d like to thank Minister Paul for breaking down this footage in much more detail and between the blackout tape covering up the outside windows to the attempts made by Wal-Mart to conceal the rest of the store, we have to ask, what is Wal-Mart hiding?
* Why are there unmarked cars at every single entrance?
* Why are plastic coverings being put up concealing every possible way to see in to the store?
* Why have they built a strange ‘staging area’ as seen at 2:20 of 2nd video?
* Why all the empty shelves if they plan to reopen in 6 months?
* Why are they using the shelves to block off the rest of the store?
* Is the 2-month severance pay being received by Wal-Mart workers ‘hush money’?
* Could these monstrous buildings with underground tunnels be transformed into something out of our worst dreams?
As Minister Paul points out, this whole thing stinks and while there will continue to be those who tell us these Wal-Marts are closed as an attack upon unions, a forthcoming ANP story should be enough to convince even the biggest skeptics that something sinister is going on at Wal-Mart and there’s a big reason for them to be hiding what that is.
How long would it take for the 1st image below to be transformed into the 2nd?
Additional photographs below video show a Wal-Mart outside of Winchester, Kentucky that is having some work done to their own parking lot. While appearing to be unsuspicious parking lot work, one commenter mentioned it seemed like the pads being cut out are being spaced out perfectly for guard towers throughout the parking lot.
VIEW ALL VIDEOS
http://www.pakalertpress.com/exclusive-video-inside-closed-jade-helm-state-wal-mart-reveals-attempt-to-hide-something-with-cops-guarding-loading-docks-and-entrances-what-is-wal-mart-hiding/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

 

Veterans Truth Radio (4-20-15) Stew Webb Raw – Illuminati Banker Pardon

Veterans Truth Radio (4-20-15) Stew Webb Raw – Illuminati Banker Pardon
Published on Apr 21, 2015 By Truth Warriors
Stew Webb discloses his latest Intel in this show about many topics.
The first being that Eric Holder and Barack Obama are giving a secret Presidential Pardon to Larry Mizel and Leonard Millman for a $2 Billion Donation to the Obama Presidential Library!
This is a red alert transmission that must be shared throughout the alternative media!
Veterans Truth Radio (4-20-15) Stew Webb Raw – Illuminati Banker Pardon 

https://youtu.be/ooc0pQ8pE0w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=359&v=ooc0pQ8pE0w

 

An Intelligence Vet Explains ISIS, Yemen, and “the Dick Cheney of Iraq”

Among other things is discussed the extent to which ISIS is “Saddam’s revenge”, having gained control of much of northern Iraq because of support from large remnants of Saddam’s Baathist state.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
An Intelligence Vet Explains ISIS, Yemen, and “the Dick Cheney of Iraq”
William M. Arkin – 4/22/15
Today marks the beginning of what I hope will be many opportunities to introduce true practitioners in the world of spying and killing to Phase Zero readers. Our first guest is Malcolm Nance, a 34-year veteran intelligence officer who has worked the Iraq mission since 1987, fighting in all of our Middle East wars since 1983. He has lived in and out of Iraq since 2003.
The death of former Saddam General Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri last week provides an opportunity to ask Nance about who the insurgent commander was, how he evaded capture or death for so many years, and what the hell is really going on in Iraq. In addition to his time on the ground, Nance has written defense intelligence textbooks on the subject—books that are occasionally dense but “are exhaustively detailed for a reason,” he says. “I am not here to entertain, but to share hard intelligence, won by the blood of dead soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines and intelligence officers and explain the deep history of these groups which leads you to ISIS.”
He is not shy about the why of knowing: So that “we kill the right people with what we learned.” Nance runs his own analytical organization, TAPSTRI, the Terror Asymmetrics Project and is author of, most recently, The Terrorists of Iraq: Inside the Strategy and Tactics of the Iraq Insurgency, 2003-2014.

[Q] On Friday, Iraqi television announced that Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri was killed in Iraq. A blip in the news, but obviously a man who you think was a shadow leader of ISIL. Who was he?
[A]…
~~~~~ Continue to the interview at: ~~~~~

http://phasezero.gawker.com/an-intelligence-vet-explains-isis-yemen-and-the-dick-1699407909

 

Survival Cooking On A DIY Home-Built Rocket Stove: Get Fed & Keep Warm

After a disaster when power is out, the two most important things people yearn for are heat and food. A rocket stove is a useful survival tool because it produces a very hot flame and needs very little fuel. These stoves are highly efficient?woodstoves, which can also burn coal or other biofuels. They are simple to construct, making sustainable cooking stations that can also be used as heating units at campsites and in your own backyard. Rocket stoves are inexpensive to build, and can be quickly erected from bricks, blocks or stones around your yard. Because they use such a small amount of fuel, they’re down right cheap to maintain and can be augmented with solar panels and other modifications to provide a wide range of heating and cooking facilities. If building one for use indoors, remember it needs to be vented.
It’s best to build your rocket stove ahead of time, so you have the opportunity to purchase any necessary items; or at least purchase what you’ll need and stash the parts somewhere safe for later. Please refer to the links in the Resources section for videos and other photos. MORE: http://www.jbbardot.com/preppers-stay-well-fed-and-warm-after-disasters-with-survival-cooking-on-a-diy-home-built-rocket-stove/
 

Did the Branch Davidian Survivors Enjoy the Benefits of Trial by Jury?

FIJA Newsletter:
As we reflect today on the anniversary of the deadly end of a 51-day siege in 1993 in Waco, Texas, I want to share with you some information you may not know about the ensuing prosecution against the Branch Davidian survivors.
By the end of the BATF and FBI assault on the Mount Carmel Center—the Branch Davidians’ home and church—nearly 80 people, including dozens of children, had died without the benefits of trial by jury.
But did the few survivors who were prosecuted enjoy those benefits?
While they were subjected to trial by jury, it was plagued by inconsistency and bias. Whether or not they had access to fully informed jurors is not entirely clear, but it was not for lack of trying! FIJA activists were on scene, leafleting the local courthouses, displaying the FIJA banner and publicly addressing those outside the courthouse. When they couldn’t get access to the master jury wheel, they went to great lengths to find addresses for vehicles parked in the vicinity of the courthouse and mail them educational literature. We do know that FIJA materials got into the hands of at least some of the jurors.
Even though they were largely kept in the dark by the judge, who was infuriated at the prospect of jurors consulting their consciences to do the right thing, these jurors acquitted all defendants of the most serious charges of murder and conspiracy to acquit murder. However, they did convict some defendants on some charges, including delivering some of the convictions mistakenly, according to jury foreman Sarah Bain. This unfortunately opened the door to abusive sentencing on the part of the judge, who unilaterally decided that there were “enhanced weapons” involved, thereby triggering mandatory minimum sentences FAR in excess of anything the jury thought fair. The appeals in their cases went all the way to the Supreme Court, who ruled 9-0 in defense of the jury’s authority as fact-finder in the courtroom.
Learn more about FIJA’s educational efforts in Waco, Texas, as well as the importance of the Branch Davidians’ case in protecting the fact-finding role of the jury in all criminal trials:
Branch Davidian Trial and Jury History
I want to thank volunteer Lisa Lewis for her extensive contributions in researching and writing this article, which will become a permanent part of a project that we will have a sneak preview of soon exclusively for you, our email list subscribers!
For Liberty, Justice, and Peace in Our Lifetimes,
Kirsten C. Tynan
Fully Informed Jury Association
Fully Informed Jury Association | aji@fija.org | PO Box 5570 | Helena, MT 59604 United States
 

Military Bulletin Labels Patriot Groups, Militia ‘Domestic Terrorists’

A military bulletin called patriot groups and the militia “domestic extremists” who may launch terrorist attacks, a claim which follows a trend by the government to demonize libertarians and constitutionalists.
The bulletin, an e-mail from a U.S. Coast Guard command security officer which was leaked to Infowars, lumped militia members and patriots with “white supremacists” and claimed they may launch terror attacks on April 19th because it is a “significant date to domestic extremists.”
“Members of the patriot and militia movements, sovereign citizens and white supremacists recall April 19th as the date that the battles of Lexington and Concord started the American Revolution,” the bulletin read. “Citing (incorrectly) Title 10 USC references to the ‘unorganized militias’ and the constitutional right to bear arms, these groups believe that they are legally obligated to oppose the government should it become tyrannical.”
See memo on link: Read More
 

The Connection Between Jade Helm & ISIS

From a reader: Is it true? Anyone in the area who can confirm this?

Snip

ISIS is operating a camp just a few miles from El Paso, Texas, according to Judicial Watch sources that includes a Mexican Army field grade officer and a Mexican Federal Police Inspector. During the course of a joint operation last week, Mexican Army and federal law enforcement officials discovered documents in Arabic and Urdu, as well as “plans” of Fort Bliss. The implications are obvious.
According to documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, the Juárez Cartel helps ISIS terrorists move through the desert and across the border between Santa Teresa and Sunland Park, New Mexico. The report goes on to state that east of El Paso and Ciudad Juárez, cartel-backed “coyotes” are also smuggling ISIS terrorists through the unguarded border between Acala and Fort Hancock, Texas. The Judicial Watch documents specifically state that these particular areas are targeted by ISIS because of “their understaffed municipal and county police forces as well as the already existing relative safe-havens the areas provide for the unchecked large-scale drug smuggling”.
ISIS Targets Identified
According to Judicial Watch, “ISIS is conducting reconnaissance of regional universities; the White Sands Missile Range; government facilities in Alamogordo, NM; Ft. Bliss; and the electrical power facilities near Anapra and Chaparral, NM”.
The ISIS Base Camp Is Part of a Much Bigger Terrorist Organization
The Common Sense Show has discovered that there is incontrovertible evidence that criminal drug cartels, like Los Zetas and the Sinaloa’s have not only used MS-13 gangsters as hit men and child sex traffickers, but so has the Juarez Cartel (partners with the ISIS leaders of the base camp near El Paso). Also participating in this terror network are members of the Barrio Azteca gang and the purpose is to enforce their will upon the border region between Mexico and the United States.
Los Zetas have also conducted training in parts of Central and South America, and have even allowed MS-13 gangsters to lead in operations as when “El Comandante Kilo” operated in San Fernando on behalf of Los Zetas. This training consists of two parts, military training and assassination. In plain corporate language, the Mexican drug cartels are outsourcing paramilitary activities such as assassinations and terrorism and their new friends, ISIS, has a base camp only a few miles from American soil. LINK for MORE
 

Office of Naval Intelligence/ JFK/ Oswald/ Hemingway

ONI – THE OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE (ONI)
and the Assassination of President Kennedy
JFK & ONI
Navy Ensign John F. Kennedy was assigned to the ONI and was working as an ONI officer when he met his sister’s college roommate Inga Arvad of Denmark. As Miss Denmark 1931 Arvad attended the propaganda tinged 1936 Olympics in Berlin where she “charmed Adolph Hitler and his cohorts so much that she gained access to their inner circle, and was Hitler’s guest” at the Olympics.
As a 1940 student at the Columbia School of Journalism [which later received funding from the CIA front Catherwood Foundation], Arvad lived with JFK’s sister Kathleen when they both worked for the New York Times Herald. At the time JFK dated Arvad, she worked for the ubiquitous North American Newspaper Alliance (NANA), which also employed Ernest Hemingway when he liberated Paris with the OSS, Priscilla Johnson McMillan when she interviewed Oswald in Moscow and Virginia Prewett when she covered Alpha 66 operations in Cuba.
Kennedy and Arvad spent some time together in a Charleston, South Carolina hotel that was bugged by the FBI, and when Arvad’s background as a possible spy was established, Kennedy was transferred out of ONI to the PT boat squadron in the Pacific.
We do know that the ONI played a major role in the study of assassination and various ways, means and methods to accomplish it. At a NATO conference in Norway on the subject of stress in combat, U.S. Navy Lt. Commander (LCDR) Thomas Narut was quoted in the London Sunday Times as saying that such research is continuous, on going and operational. 

 
According to Narut, “…combat readiness units…include men for commando-type operations and…for insertion into U.S. embassies under cover,…ready to kill in those countries should the need arise….U.S. Navy psychologists specially selected men for these commando tasks, from submarine crews, paratroops, and some were convicted murderers from military prisons…Research on those given awards for valor in battle [ie. Audie Murphy] has shown….that the best killers are men with ‘passive-aggressive’ personalities…Among the tests used is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. This consists of hundreds of questions, and rates personality on many traits including such things as hostility, depression, psychopathy…” The Times reported that, “The men selected were brought either to the Navy’s neuropsychiatric laboratory in San Diego, California (which also trains spys in techniques to counter interrogation), or to the laboratory where Narut works in the U.S. Naval Medical Center in Naples.”
OSWALD & ONI
Gerald Posner’s “Case Closed” (Random House, 1993), noted that when Oswald was tested by Dr. R. Hartog as a New York City delinquent, “Hartog’s diagnosis [of Oswald] was that of a ‘personality pattern disturbance….and passive-aggressive tendencies,” – just what the Navy psychs were looking for in potential assassins.
Following in the footsteps of his older brother, Lee Harvey Oswald joined the USMC as soon as he was legally of age, and was twice stationed in San Diego, California, home of the Navy’s “neuropsychiatric” lab where they taught counter-intelligence and interrogation resistance techniques.
Trained as a radar operator, Oswald was also stationed at Atsugi, Japan, where he occasionally stood guard duty at the U2 hanger. In 1956, Edwin P. Wilson was assigned to a sixty man detachment responsible for U2 security, which was based at North Las Vegas, Nevada, abut assigned overseas under cover of the Maritime Survey Associates, of 80 Boylston St., Boston, Mass. For some time Wilson served in Japan but he also was stationed at Adana, Turkey when Francis Gary Powers was flying out of there. Wilson would later, in 1971, serve in ONI’s Task Force 157, which was established by RA Rufus Taylor, who was director of ONI at the time of the assassination.
Oswald may have become involved in ONI counter-intelligence operations in Japan, (when DONI Rufus Taylor was also there) and where he is said to have been the target for recruitment by KGB assets. Although the Navy has refused to even admit that such a program existed, and some, like Otto Otepka of State Dept. Security, lost their jobs over it, there apparently was a Navy run defector program that included Oswald.
When Oswald left the USMC he returned to his hometown of New Orleans, from where he obtained, from a travel agency at the World Trade Mart, passage on a tramp steamer to Europe, the first leg of his journey to Russia. On his passport was stamped his occupation: “Import-Export Agent.”
In New Orleans at the same time, and the only time and place their careers and travels have thus far shown to overlap, Col. Jose Rivera, USAR was teaching at a local medical college. When Oswald was stationed at San Diego before his defection, although in the Army Reserves, Rivera was stationed at a Naval Research Center near San Francisco, California.
After Oswald defected, his honorable discharge was changed to “undesirable,” which infuriated him once he learned of it, and indeed, how could he be declared “undesirable” after he had already left the service. Another Catch-22.
Writing a letter to the Secretary of the Navy John Connally, Oswald compared his trip to Minsk was “like Hemingway went to Paris.” Now Priscilla Johnson McMillan, who knew Oswald in Moscow, wrote that Oswald compared his stay in Russia to when Hemingway went to Paris in the 1920s. But Oswald didn’t say the 1920s, when Hemingway lived there with the Lost Generation. He could have instead been referring to Hemingway’s liberation of Paris in 1944.
While working in liaison with the ONI in the Caribbean, Hemingway kept watch for Nazi subs and ships while fishing aboard his boat the Pilar, the fuel for which was supplied by the ONI. After D-Day however, Hemingway went to England, where his son was a British Special Operations trained JEDBERG. He was dropped behind the lines where he was captured and held prisoner until the war’s end. After D-Day, Hemingway obtained correspondent credentials and went to France, where he hooked up with an OSS contingent led by Col. David Bruce. Bruce would later become Hemingway’s best man and serve as John F. Kennedy’s ambassador to the Court of St. James (UK). After the fight for Paris was mainly over, Hemingway, Bruce and their commandos liberated the bar of the Ritz Hotel, which had been occupied by the German General command earlier that morning. Hemingway took a head count of his party and ordered sixty vodka martinis, shaken-not-stirred.
Oswald’s letter to Connally that mentioned “Hemingway in Paris” was received by the new Secretary of the Navy, Fred Korth, a Fort Worth attorney who knew Oswald’s family. Korth had to resign as Navy Sec in the weeks before the assassination because he was entwined with the controversial TFX jet fighter contract negotiations with General Dynamics and the Continental National Bank of Fort Worth. Korth was also present at the Hotel Cortez meeting when JFK and LBJ hashed out the details of the Texas trip.
When Oswald returned to Texas with his Russian wife, he met George DeMohrenschildt, who became a close friend. One of the more bizarre incidents between Oswald and DeMohrenschildt is the story of how DeMohrenschildt tried to get Oswald a job at Collins Radio by introducing him to a Collins executive – retired US Navy Admiral Chester Bruton.
DeMohrenschildt came knocking at Bruton’s door saying that he knew the previous owners of the house, and using his well-honed charm, managed an invitation to use Bruton’s pool, and invited Marina to use it as well. One day, while Marina and DeMohrenschildt were lounging by the pool with Bruton, Oswald arrived unannounced and stayed for lunch. Oswald didn’t get along very well with the Admiral, an officer and “lifer” and needless to say, he didn’t get a job at Collins. DeMohrenschildt tried to sell him on the fact that after all, Oswald did work in a radio factory in Russia. But the Collins Radio connections would later multiply and require closer examination [See: The Collins Radio Connections http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2008/01/collins-radio-connections.html].
Bruton was a former nuclear submarine commander who was hired by Collins after he retired from the Navy. He was reportedly working on a new electronics system for communicating with nuclear submarines at sea. Operating under the code names “Binnacle” and “Holystone,” the ONI began using nuclear subs, not only for nuclear Polaris missile deterrent, but for electronic espionage. As mentioned in “Blind Man’s Bluff – The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage” (By Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew, Harper, 1998), “Congress okayed these popular proposals and offered up funding that caught the attention of the Office of Naval Intelligence. The Navy might have been promising an era that mirrored Jules Verne, but a few submarine espionage specialists now saw the means to launch a new age of spying that would be much closer to James Bond.”
“In addition to these operations off the Soviet Coast, some diesel subs carried Russian émigrés back to the Soviet Union to spy for the United States, and other diesel subs were landing commandos in places like Borneo, Indonesia and the Middle East to track the expanding Soviet influence. [Shortly after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, Navy commandos used diesel submarines to engineer the escape of prominent Cubans from Castro’s regime. Over several weeks, commandos slipped from the subs and rowed to shore in inflatable rafts. The Cubans who were piloted back to the subs often had to dive 15 to 30 feet through dark waters to enter the submerged craft through special pressurized compartments. May of those rescued likely would have been jailed or executed for plotting to overthrow Castro, according to former U.S. sailors involved in the operation.”
“Couriers met returning submarines at the dock, ready to whisk the intelligence directly to NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland,” so it is interesting that Oswald met and leafleted the crew when the USS Wasp put into port at New Orleans.
After the shooting of Gen. Edwin Walker Lee Harvey Oswald took a bus from Dallas, Texas to his hometown of New Orleans, where through the efforts of an old family friend, Mrs. Myrtle Evans, he obtained an apartment on Magazine Street and then got a job at the Riley Coffee Company.
Two weeks earlier, in Washington, D.C., Dr./Col. Jose Rivera, USAR, gave Adele Edisen Oswald’s New Orleans Magazine street phone number – that’s two weeks before Oswald himself knew where he would be living. At the time, Dr./Col. Rivera, although in the U.S. Army Reserves, was officially stationed at the U.S. Naval Biological Lab at the University of California, Berkeley.
The ONI offices in New Orleans were in the same building where Oswald kept his Post Office box, just across the street from 544 Camp Street, the central base of various nefarious operations run by Guy Bannister. Although his record does not indicate he ever served in the Navy, Bannister is said to have worked with the FBI in New York when they were working with the Mafia in liaison with the ONI.
Bannister did have a friend, Guy Persac Johnson, served in ONI in the Pacific and later became Jim Garrison’s law partner and for awhile, Clay Shaw’s attorney. Guy P. Johnson was alleged to have a copy of the elusive “Homme Report” that ostensibly proves that RFK had a contract out to kill Castro.
Garrison mentions in a footnote to On The Trail of the Assassins, that the Louisiana State Police found a book in Guy Bannister’s office on Naval Intelligence, by Admiral Ellis Zacharias.
One of Zacharias’ literary collaborators was Ladislas Farago, who wrote a series of articles in 1963 on the woeful state of U.S. anti-submarine warfare preparation. He said they were lacking Congressional backing which hampered weapon research and the improving of technology and that the cautious spending would also result in mechanical deficiencies. About two months after Farago’s material was published, the Thresher went down.
From New Orleans, Lee Harvey Oswald returned to Texas, via Mexico City around the same time that three men visited Sylvia Odio and her sister, one of whom was “Leon Oswald, an ex-Marine who could kill anyone, like the Secretary of the Navy.”
Around the same time, Edward Bray was visited by three men in suits who claimed to represent JFCOTT – Justice for the Crew of The Thresher, the nuclear sub that went down with all hands, ostensibly because of faulty hardware made by the Bendix corporation, for whom Bray worked. Like Odio’s visitors the JFCOTT visiters to Bray also threatened the President and Governor Connally, the former Secretary of the Navy. Bray even wrote to Connally to warn him of the threats. After the assassination, some people, like James Reston, Jr., son of the NY Times reporter, speculated that Oswald actually intended to shoot Connally rather than Kennedy.
In his book “Reasonable Doubt” Henry Hurt attributes some shady “bagman” activities in New Orleans to an unnamed former Navy man and Notre Dame alumni, while former D.A. Jim Garrison recalled being approached and threatened about his investigation into the Kennedy assassination and by Colorado oilman John Miller, who had attended the U.S. Naval Academy.
A number of Oswald’s former USMC shipmates return to action in the drama, including G.P. Hemming in San Diego, Kerry Thornley and A. Hiedell in New Orleans and Roscoe White in Dallas. Roscoe White, who sailed to Japan with Oswld, and later worked for the Dallas Police Department, allegedly worked under cover for ONI. According to documents obtained by his son, he received ONI typed orders:
Navy Int.
Code A. M R C
Remark data
1666106
NRC VRC NAC
- 1963

http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2011/10/oni-assassination-of-president-kennedy.html

 

IRAN, UNITED NATIONS CALLS FOR CEASEFIRE IN YEMEN

April 22, 2015

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has outlined a proposal for the cessation of hostilities in Yemen through a letter to the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on April 17.
This plan involves four demands: an immediate ceasefire, the halt to attacks by Saudi-GCC led war planes, the provisions for a safe corridor to provide much-needed humanitarian relief and the resumption of political dialogue. This proposal came just one day after the UN Secretary General called for an immediate ceasefire.
On April 20, Zarif published a letter in the opinion and editorial section of the New York Times stating Iran’s willingness to cooperate with other regional states and the international community in solving the crisis of the numerous wars in the Persian Gulf and the broader Middle East. The foreign minister stressed that Teheran’s recent agreement over its nuclear program with the United States and European Union could serve as an impetus for serious multi-lateral talks on other issues.
Zarif noted that although this agreement was a step forward in relations between Washington and Teheran, much more work needed to be done. Absent of a broader framework for resolving ongoing interventions and humanitarian challenges, the current atmosphere of dialogue could easily be lost to open confrontation over Yemen, Iraq, Syria and other countries.
The foreign minister stressed that “to seal the anticipated nuclear deal, more political will is required. The Iranian people have shown their resolve by choosing to engage with dignity. It is time for the United States and its Western allies to make the choice between cooperation and confrontation, between negotiations and grandstanding, and between agreement and coercion.” (NYT, April 20)
This same letter goes on to emphasize that “If one were to begin serious discussion of the calamities the region faces, Yemen would be a good place to start. Iran has offered a reasonable and practical approach to address this painful and unnecessary crisis.”
Ansurallah Leader Says U.S. at the Root of War in Yemen
Since March 26 Saudi Arabian air forces in alliance with other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, without any semblance of a UN or international mandate, have carried out the massive bombardment of Yemen. There has also been a naval blockade denying much needed food and other goods entry into the most underdeveloped territories in the region.
Nonetheless, the UN Security Council passed a resolution on April 14 imposing an arms embargo on the Ansurallah movement demanding that they withdraw from areas in which their fighters have control. The resolution also placed asset freezes and travel bans on key leaders of the Houthis.
The U.S. supplies the Saudis and the GCC with fighter planes, weapons, intelligence support and refueling which is facilitating the bombing of Yemen. The Ansurallah (Houthis) is a Shia-based movement which has taken large swaths of territory in the north, central and south of Yemen.
In a television address aired over Press TV, the Ansurallah leader, Abdel-Malik al-Houthi, blamed the U.S. for the war against his country. He charged the Pentagon with pointing out areas to be attacked in Yemen.
Al-Houthi said “We do not need permission from the UNSC to defend our country, stressing the Yemeni people have the right and legitimacy to defend. Our great people will not surrender, they will stand.” (Press TV, April 19)
The Ansurallah leader claimed that the Saudi aggression is destroying valuable resources in Yemen, which are criminal acts absent of any legitimacy. He held the view that the objectives of the Saudi-GCC bombing is to “return Yemen to the Israeli and US identity.” Al-Houti said that anyone who supports the aggression against Yemen is engaging in a war that is being waged by Saudi Arabia.
Bombing Spreads in Yemen
Meanwhile the Saudi-GCC alliance continues its bombing in 18 out of 22 provinces in Yemen displacing 150,000 people, killing an estimated 2,600 people, mostly civilians, and the wounding of 2,900 others. Fighting has escalated in the Hadramaut province around Makalla where a battle is being waged against al-Qaeda fighters who have attempted to seize an airport, government buildings and a refinery.
A further escalation in the bombardments took place on April 20 when homes were destroyed in Sanaa killing at least 15 people. Some reports suggests that the target of the airstrikes was a munitions storage center in the area although other residential neighborhoods have been bombed over the last three weeks.
Oxfam, the London-based humanitarian organization, reported that many civilians have been targets of the attacks. The group said that one of its food storage warehouses was struck where no arms or fighters from the Ansurallah are based.
“The contents of the warehouse had no military value,” the group declared. “This is an absolute outrage, particularly when one considers that we have shared detailed information with the coalition on the locations of our offices and storage facilities.” (NYT, April 20)
With specific reference to the April 20 bombing in Sanaa, the Reuters press agency said “The blast hit the base on Faj Attan mountain beside the Hadda district, home to the presidential palace and many embassies, and sent a tall mushroom cloud into the air. Resident Adel Mansour said it was the largest explosion in more than three weeks of bombing by the Saudi-led coalition.”
Bombing of Yemen Raises Diplomatic Tensions Threatening Broader War
The bombing in Sanaa on April 20 set off another round of diplomatic wrangling where the Iranian foreign ministry summoned the Saudi Arabian ambassador in Teheran to express their displeasure at the current situation. Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi said in Jakarta that the government was opposed to the bombings which have resulted in the wounding of two of its diplomatic personnel.
A Yemeni television station, al-Yemen al-Youm, was hit by the Saudi-GCC bombs on April 20 leaving three of its staff dead. The area around Faj Attan has been a frequent target of the air campaign over the last few weeks.
Iran in recent statements have expressed its willingness to become more directly involved in the Yemeni situation warning Saudi Arabia and the U.S. that any attack on its territory will be met with fierce retaliation. Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif said on April 20 during a meeting with his Syrian counterpart Faisal al-Miqdad that “We are deeply concerned over the killing of defenseless and innocent people in Yemen and the destruction of the country’s infrastructure and we will make our utmost efforts to bring an end to this massacre.”
Just one day before the commander of Iranian Army’s Ground Forces Brigadier General Ahmad Reza Pourdastan warned Saudi Arabia of “facing a crushing response from inside Yemen if the ongoing aggression against the Arab country continues.” Brigadier General Pourdasatan says “The Saudi Arabian army has no war experience and is very fragile and if it is confronted with a war of attrition, it should await crushing blows and it will suffer heavy defeat.” (Press TV, April 19)
Operation Decisive Storm, as it is called by the Saudi-GCC alliance, is a manifestation of the United States imperialist efforts to continue its proxy war against Iran through the control of the political and military situation in Yemen. The expansion of the warn in Yemen has implications for developments in Iraq and Syria as both states have spoken out about its strong opposition to the bombing of Yemen and the threat of a possible ground invasion by Egypt and Sunni-led rebel groups which are funded by Riyadh.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/iran-united-nations-calls-for-ceasefire-in-yemen/5444297?print=1
 

102 YEARS OF TAXATION: CHART SHOWS HOW OUT OF CONTROL THE IRS HAS GOTTEN


With the end of “tax season” nearly a week behind us, many Americans are likely moving through the five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, or acceptance.
It is probably not shocking to anyone to hear that the IRS is among the most hated and feared of the government agencies (it has taken first place in many annual polls). A quick look at the history of the income tax might provide some hints as to why we despise the agency so much:
From IJReview:
The modern income tax began in February 1913 when Congress passed the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, thanks to the administration of Republican William Howard Taft.
The House passed the short amendment in July 1909, with a 318 to 14 vote:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on income, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
The first tax bill came from the Woodrow Wilson administration in 1913. Wilson made the income tax a key part of his electoral campaign (the Republican party platform of 1912 did not mention the income tax).
This chart from Americans for Tax Reform shows just how much the income tax has grown since 1913:

As if that chart wasn’t painful enough to read, the nonprofit Tax Foundation (a nonpartisan research think tank based in Washington, DC) has published the following findings in its 2015 Tax Freedom Day article:
Tax Freedom Day is the day when the nation as a whole has earned enough money to pay its total tax bill for the year. Tax Freedom Day takes all federal, state, and local taxes and divides them by the nation’s income.
This year, Tax Freedom Day falls on April 24, or 114 days into the year.
Americans will pay $3.3 trillion in federal taxes and $1.5 trillion in state and local taxes, for a total bill of more than $4.8 trillion, or 31 percent of the nation’s income.
Tax Freedom Day is one day later than last year due mainly to the country’s continued steady economic growth, which is expected to boost tax revenue especially from the corporate, payroll, and individual income tax.
Americans will collectively spend more on taxes in 2015 than they will on food, clothing, and housing combined.
If you include annual federal borrowing, which represents future taxes owed, Tax Freedom Day would occur 14 days later on May 8.
Tax Freedom Day is a significant date for taxpayers and lawmakers because it represents how long Americans as a whole have to work in order to pay the nation’s tax burden.
This year, Americans will work the longest to pay federal, state, and local individual income taxes (43 days). Payroll taxes will take 26 days to pay, followed by sales and excise taxes (15 days), corporate income taxes (12 days), and property taxes (11 days). The remaining 7 days are spent paying estate and inheritance taxes, customs duties, and other taxes.
Michael Hausam of IJReview reminds us that Richard Byrd, the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates in 1913, warned what he imagined income tax would become:
A hand from Washington will be stretched out and placed upon every man’s business; the eye of the Federal inspector will be in every man’s counting house. The law will of necessity have inquisitorial features, it will provide penalties, it will create complicated machinery. Under it men will be hailed into courts distant from their homes.
Heavy fines imposed by distant and unfamiliar tribunals will constantly menace the tax payer. An army of Federal inspectors, spies and detectives will descend upon the state. Who of us who have had knowledge of the doings of the Federal officials in the Internal Revenue service can be blind to what will follow?
Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, said:
“The American income tax is perhaps the most dramatic example of how government grows at the expense of liberty. Slowly. Constantly. Inexorably.”
Indeed, it is.
– See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/102-years-of-taxation-chart-shows-how-out-of-control-the-irs-has-gotten_042015#sthash.bjMIA9WH.dpuf

 

SUPREME COURT SAYS POLICE VIOLATED 4TH AMENDMENT WHEN USE OF DRUG-SNIFFING DOG PROLONGED ROUTINE TRAFFIC STOP

n a 6-3 decision issued today in the case of Rodriguez v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Nebraska police violated the Fourth Amendment by extending an otherwise lawful traffic stop in order to let a drug-sniffing dog investigate the outside of the vehicle.
According to the majority opinion of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, “a police stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made violates the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures.”
While “an officer…may conduct certain unrelated checks during an otherwise lawful traffic stop,” Ginsburg held, “a dog sniff, unlike the routine measures just mentioned, is not an ordinary incident of a traffic stop.”
At issue was a 2012 traffic stop conducted by a Nebraska police officer who happened to have his K-9 dog in the cruiser with him. When the stopped driver, Dennys Rodriguez, refused to consent to letting the drug dog walk around the outside of his vehicle, the Nebraska officer called for back-up, thereby prolonging the stop by an additional eight minutes. According to the Court’s ruling today, those extra minutes violated Rodriguez’s constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment.
During the January 2015 oral argument in the case, Justice Sonia Sotomayor previewed the Court’s skepticism towards the police officer’s approach. “We can’t keep bending the Fourth Amendment to the resources of law enforcement,” Sotomayor declared. “Particularly when this stop is not incidental to the purpose of the stop. It’s purely to help the police get more criminals, yes. But then the Fourth Amendment becomes a useless piece of paper.”
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Rodriguez v. United States is available here.
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/21/supreme-court-says-police-violated-4th-a#.drapl9:VCac